Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Midi Tools (P) Ltd.

Collector of Central Excise vs Midi Tools (P) Ltd.

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Jan 24, 2000
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/17535

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided On
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Collector of Central Excise

Respondent

Midi Tools (P) Ltd.

Legal References

Reported In
(2000)(69)ECC727

Excerpt

1. the short point to be considered by the larger bench in this case is whether limitation commences from the date of payment of duty or limitation starts from the end of the financial year for the purpose of claiming refund.2. when this matter was called, shri r.d. negi, learned sdr accompanied with shri s. srivastava, learned jdr submitted that the issue referred to the larger bench is no longer res integra in view of the fact that the very issue has already been considered by the larger bench as per order no. e/989-990/97-b, dated 4-7-1997 reported in 1997 (96) e.l.t.257 (t). they drew our attention to the finding portion of the said order as appearing in para 12 of the decision. it is as under :- "12. in the light of the above discussion, we hold that the time limit for refund claims filed on the basis of the notifications granting exemption based upon the value of clearances during a particular financial year will commence from the date of payment of duty and that such refund claims are covered by explanation (f) to section 11b of the cesa,1944".3. since the issue involved herein has already been considered and concluded by the tribunal in the aforesaid case, following the ratio, we hold that limitation starts from the date of payment of duty and not from the end of the financial year. accordingly, this reference is answered.

Full Judgment

1. The short point to be considered by the Larger Bench in this case is whether limitation commences from the date of payment of duty or limitation starts from the end of the financial year for the purpose of claiming refund.

2. When this matter was called, Shri R.D. Negi, learned SDR accompanied with Shri S. Srivastava, learned JDR submitted that the issue referred to the Larger Bench is no longer res integra in view of the fact that the very issue has already been considered by the Larger Bench as per Order No. E/989-990/97-B, dated 4-7-1997 reported in 1997 (96) E.L.T.257 (T). They drew our attention to the finding portion of the said order as appearing in para 12 of the decision. It is as under :- "12. In the light of the above discussion, we hold that the time limit for refund claims filed on the basis of the Notifications granting exemption based upon the value of clearances during a particular financial year will commence from the date of payment of duty and that such refund claims are covered by Explanation (f) to Section 11B of the CESA,1944".

3. Since the issue involved herein has already been considered and concluded by the Tribunal in the aforesaid case, following the ratio, we hold that limitation starts from the date of payment of duty and not from the end of the financial year. Accordingly, this reference is answered.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial