TVS MOTOR COMPANY LIMITED Vs V Sanjay, Proprietor, M/s Janatha Motors

Tvs Motor Company Limited vs V Sanjay, Proprietor, M/s Janatha Motors

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Feb 17, 2025

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1753334

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1753334
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose
Decided On: Feb 17, 2025
Case Number: A/436/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Tvs Motor Company Limited

Respondent

V Sanjay, Proprietor, M/s Janatha Motors

Excerpt

tvs motor company limited,chennai. .. applicant vs. v.sanjay .. respondent the learned counsel for the respondent has stated no objection for allowing this application. it is represented by both the counsels that in all likelihood, the parties will report settlement of the matter before the arbitrator. this court is also satisfied with the reasons contained in the affidavit filed in support of this application, as sufficient cause has been shown by the applicant seeking for extension of time for the arbitrator to pronounce the arbitral award. accordingly, this application is allowed as prayed for by extending the time for completion of the arbitration and passing of the arbitral award by the arbitrator by a period of six months from today.rkm rkm

Full Judgment

TVS Motor Company Limited,

Chennai. .. Applicant Vs. V.Sanjay .. Respondent The learned counsel for the respondent has stated no objection for allowing this application. It is represented by both the counsels that in all likelihood, the parties will report settlement of the matter before the Arbitrator. This Court is also satisfied with the reasons contained in the affidavit filed in support of this application, as sufficient cause has been shown by the applicant seeking for extension of time for the Arbitrator to pronounce the arbitral award. Accordingly, this application is allowed as prayed for by extending the time for completion of the arbitration and passing of the arbitral award by the Arbitrator by a period of six months from today.

rkm rkm

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2025 Same Parties Tvs Motor Company Limited vs V Sanjay, Proprietor, M/s Janath... Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose