Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

M/S.Knit Gallery vs the Chairman

M/S.Knit Gallery vs The Chairman

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Jan 31, 2025
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1752726

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/3405/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

M/S.Knit Gallery

Respondent

The Chairman

Excerpt

.....payable to the petitioner towards refundable security deposit in respect of petitioner's solar power plant htsc no.059514500124.3. it is the case of the petitioner that it applied for establishment of5 mw solar power plant as per the tnerc's solar order no.5/2018, dated 28.03.2018. as a precondition, the petitioner deposited a sum of rs.50,00,000/- towards refundable security. the letter of intent was issued to the petitioner for commissioning of the solar power plant on 30.06.2022 and the petitioner satisfactorily commissioned the said plant on 12.09.2022 well within the time limit. therefore, the petitioner is entitled to refund of the entire security deposit amount. inspite of the commissioning of the solar power plant within time, the respondents have not paid the deposit amount to the petitioner. hence, the petitioner has come before this court.4. mr.d.r.arunkumar, learned standing counsel, who is takingnotice for the respondents would submit that the petitioner's solar power plant was commissioned within the time limit. therefore, the petitioner is entitled to refund of the entire security deposit amount.5. in view of the same, the 2nd respondent is directed to refund the security deposit amount of rs.50,00,000/- paid by the petitioner as a precondition for commissioning of solar power plant in htsc no.059514500124, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.6. with the above direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. nocosts. 31.01.2025 (2/4) index :yes / no speaking order :yes / no neutral citation :yes / no dm to 1.the chairman, 2.chief engineer, non conventional energy sources, 3.director-generation,s.sounthar, j.dm 31.01.2025 (2/4)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 31.01.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR M/s Knit Gallery, No.33, Saraswathiammal Industrial Complex, Murugapalayam, Tirupur Rep, by its Authorized Signatory R. Balaji ... Petitioner vs. 1.The Chairman, 2.Chief Engineer, Non Conventional Energy Sources, 3.Director-Generation, Chennai 600 002. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents to refund the Rs.50,00,000/- payable to the petitioner towards refundable security deposit in the account of the Petitioner's Solar Power Plant HTSC No.059514500124. For Petitioner : Mr.R.S.Pandiyaraj For Respondents : Mr.D.R.Arunkumar Standing Counsel (TNEB)

ORDER

By consent of both the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as respondents, this writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage itself.

2. The petitioner herein seeks a direction to the respondents to refund a sum of Rs.50,00,000/- payable to the petitioner towards refundable security deposit in respect of petitioner's Solar Power Plant HTSC No.059514500124.

3. It is the case of the petitioner that it applied for establishment of

5 MW Solar Power Plant as per the TNERC's Solar Order No.5/2018, dated 28.03.2018. As a precondition, the petitioner deposited a sum of Rs.50,00,000/- towards refundable security. The letter of intent was issued to the petitioner for commissioning of the solar power plant on 30.06.2022 and the petitioner satisfactorily commissioned the said plant on 12.09.2022 well within the time limit. Therefore, the petitioner is entitled to refund of the entire security deposit amount. Inspite of the commissioning of the solar power plant within time, the respondents have not paid the deposit amount to the petitioner. Hence, the petitioner has come before this Court.

4. Mr.D.R.Arunkumar, learned Standing Counsel, who is taking

notice for the respondents would submit that the petitioner's solar power plant was commissioned within the time limit. Therefore, the petitioner is entitled to refund of the entire security deposit amount.

5. In view of the same, the 2nd respondent is directed to refund the security deposit amount of Rs.50,00,000/- paid by the petitioner as a precondition for commissioning of Solar Power Plant in HTSC No.059514500124, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

6. With the above direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. No

costs. 31.01.2025 (2/4) Index :Yes / No Speaking order :Yes / No Neutral Citation :Yes / No dm To 1.The Chairman, 2.Chief Engineer, Non Conventional Energy Sources, 3.Director-Generation,

S.SOUNTHAR, J.

dm 31.01.2025 (2/4)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial