Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rojo Joseph vs State of Kerala

Rojo Joseph vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jul 30, 2020
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1752623

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./1684/2020

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rojo Joseph

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice p.v.kunhikrishnan thursday, the 30th day of july 2020 / 8th sravana, 1942 bail appl..no.1684 of 2020 crime no.19/2020 of varandarappilly police station , thrissur petitioner/accused: rojo joseph aged 38 years s/o. joseph m.p., madasseri house, thiruvallamala p.o., thrissur district, pin-680 588. by adv. sri.s.sudheesh kumar respondent/complainant: 1 state of kerala represented by public prosecutor, high court of kerala, ernakulam, kochi-682 031. 2 sub inspector of police varandarapilly police station, thrissur district. by sri.renjith.t.r., pp this bail application having come up for admission on 30.07.2020, the court on the same day passed the following: b.a. no.1684 of 2020 2o r d e rdated this the 30th day of july, 2020 … this bail application filed under section 438 of the code of criminal procedure (cr.p.c.) came up for consideration today through video conference.2. the petitioner is the accused in crime no.19 of 2020 of varandarappilly police station. the above case is registered alleging offence punishable under section 55(a)(i) of the abkari act.3. when this bail application came up forconsideration today, there was no representation from the petitioner. this bail application was filed on 2.3.2020. this is an application under section 438 cr.p.c.4. the learned public prosecutor opposed the bail application.5. in the light of section 41a of the abkari act,i am not in a position to allow this bail application in the light of the opposition from the public prosecutor. anyway, there was no representation from the petitioner. therefore, this bail application is closed. sd/- p.v.kunhikrishnan pkk judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JULY 2020 / 8TH SRAVANA, 1942 Bail Appl..No.1684 OF 2020 CRIME NO.19/2020 OF Varandarappilly Police Station , Thrissur PETITIONER/ACCUSED: ROJO JOSEPH AGED 38 YEARS S/O. JOSEPH M.P., MADASSERI HOUSE, THIRUVALLAMALA P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN-680 588. BY ADV. SRI.S.SUDHEESH KUMAR RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-682 031. 2 SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE VARANDARAPILLY POLICE STATION, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY SRI.RENJITH.T.R., PP THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30.07.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: B.A. No.1684 of 2020 2

O R D E R

Dated this the 30th day of July, 2020 … This Bail Application filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.) came up for consideration today through Video Conference.

2. The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.19 of 2020 of Varandarappilly Police Station. The above case is registered alleging offence punishable under Section 55(a)(i) of the Abkari Act.

3. When this bail application came up for

consideration today, there was no representation from the petitioner. This Bail Application was filed on 2.3.2020. This is an application under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

4. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application.

5. In the light of Section 41A of the Abkari Act,

I am not in a position to allow this bail application in the light of the opposition from the Public Prosecutor. Anyway, there was no representation from the petitioner. Therefore, this bail application is closed. Sd/- P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN pkk JUDGE

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial