Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sri Sukumar vs the State of Karnataka

Sri Sukumar vs The State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Jan 31, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1750051

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL.P/10239/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sri Sukumar

Respondent

The State of Karnataka

Excerpt

.....of karnataka by budikote police station, k.g.f, represented by state public prosecutor high court buildings bengaluru - 560 001.2. sri. praveen kumars/o manjunath aged about 25 years r/at bairaganahalli village, k.g.f taluk - 563 114. …respondents (by sri. thejesh.p, hcgp for r1, sri. manu shankar s.s, advocate for r2) this crl.p is filed u/s.482 of cr.p.c praying toquash the entire proceedings against the petitioners in spl. s.c. ipc and sc/st 7/2024 (in crime no. 05/2024 of budikote police station) for the offences punishable under sections 212, 307, 323, 342, 504, 506 r/w of ipc and section 3(2)(v) of s.c./st prevention of atrocities act, 1989 now which is pending on the file of the ii addl. district and sessions judge at kolar.this petition, coming on for admission, this day,order was made therein as under:-3- coram: hon'ble mr justice s.r.krishna kumaroral orderafter arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petition may be disposed of reserving liberty in favour of the petitioners to seek discharge and/or file an application for discharge before the sessions court, who may be directed to consider and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.2. submission is placed on record.3. petition is disposed of reserving liberty in favour of the petitioners to seek discharge and/or file an application for discharge, which shall be considered by the sessions court in accordance with law.4. liberty is also reserved in favour of the petitioners to take recourse to such other remedies as available in law subsequently. sd/- (s.r.krishna kumar) judge vm list no.: 2 sl no.: 20

Full Judgment

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 10239 OF 2024 BETWEEN:

1. SRI. SUKUMAR AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS

2. SRI. NAGARAJ S/O NANJAPPA GOUNDER AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS

3. SRI. VELU AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS

4. SRI. SARAVANA @ MUTTU

S/O CHIKKA MUTHU Digitally signed by AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS MAYAGAIAH VINUTHA Location: HIGH PETITIONERS NO.1 TO 4 COURT OF KARNATAKA R/O KADIRENAHALLI VILLAGE, K.G.F - 563 114

5. SRI. KUMARAN S S/O SELVA SEGARAN AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS R/AT NO.1048 A ARASANAPALLI VILLAGE, BANDARAPALLI, NATRAMPALLI TALUK THIRUPATHUR DISTRICT -2- VELLORE, TAMILNADU - 632 001. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. NANJUNDA GOWDA M.R, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY BUDIKOTE POLICE STATION, K.G.F, REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDINGS BENGALURU - 560 001.

2. SRI. PRAVEEN KUMAR

S/O MANJUNATH AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS R/AT BAIRAGANAHALLI VILLAGE, K.G.F TALUK - 563 114. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. THEJESH.P, HCGP FOR R1, SRI. MANU SHANKAR S.S, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO

QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE PETITIONERS IN SPL. S.C. IPC AND SC/ST 7/2024 (IN CRIME NO. 05/2024 OF BUDIKOTE POLICE STATION) FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 212, 307, 323, 342, 504, 506 R/W OF IPC AND SECTION 3(2)(v) OF S.C./ST PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES ACT, 1989 NOW WHICH IS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT KOLAR.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

-3- CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR

ORAL ORDER

After arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petition may be disposed of reserving liberty in favour of the petitioners to seek discharge and/or file an application for discharge before the Sessions Court, who may be directed to consider and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.

2. Submission is placed on record.

3. Petition is disposed of reserving liberty in favour of the petitioners to seek discharge and/or file an application for discharge, which shall be considered by the Sessions Court in accordance with law.

4. Liberty is also reserved in favour of the petitioners to take recourse to such other remedies as available in law subsequently. SD/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE VM List No.: 2 Sl No.: 20

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial