Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Deepa Lakshmi vs the State

Deepa Lakshmi vs The State

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Apr 01, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1749537

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL.P/10547/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Deepa Lakshmi

Respondent

The State

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 1st day of april, 2025 before the hon'ble mr justice mohammad nawaz criminal petition no. 10547 of 2022 (482(cr.pc) / 528(bnss)) between: deepa lakshmi w/o deepak joseph xavier aged about 32 years, r/a venkateshwara nilaya, 2nd main, 1st cross, kanakashree layout, kothanoor bangalore-560077. …petitioner (by sri. ashwin joyston kutinha.,advocate) and:1. the staterepresented by the sation house officer kothanoor police station, digitally by state public prosecutor, signed by lakshmi t high court of karnataka, location: bangalore-560001. high court of karnataka2. deepak joseph xaviers/o late vincent xaveir, aged about 34 years, r/a flat no.0001, kamadhenu apartment, ramakrishnappa road, cox town, bangalore-560005. …respondents (by sri. rashmi patel., hcgp for r1; sri. b. siddeswara., advocate for r2) -2- this crl.p is filed u/s 482 cr.pc praying to quash the complaint, fir in cr.no.146/2022 pertaining to the kothanoor p.s., and all the further proceedings, pending on the file of 11th a.c.m.m., mayo hall, bengaluru for the offence p/u/s 323, 324, 344, 363 r/w 34 of ipc. this petition, coming on for admission, this day,order was made therein as under:coram: hon'ble mr justice mohammad nawazoral orderit is submitted by the learned high court government pleader that the police have filed b report in this case and the said b report is accepted by the learned magistrate.2. in view of the above submission, petition seeking quashing of the proceedings does not survive for consideration.3. accordingly, petition is disposed of.4. i.a.no.1/2022 is disposed of. sd/- (mohammad nawaz) judge ldc:list no.: 1 sl no.: 18

Full Judgment

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 10547 OF 2022 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: DEEPA LAKSHMI W/O DEEPAK JOSEPH XAVIER AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/A VENKATESHWARA NILAYA, 2ND MAIN, 1ST CROSS, KANAKASHREE LAYOUT, KOTHANOOR BANGALORE-560077. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ASHWIN JOYSTON KUTINHA.,ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE

REPRESENTED BY THE SATION HOUSE OFFICER KOTHANOOR POLICE STATION, Digitally BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, signed by LAKSHMI T HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, Location: BANGALORE-560001. High Court of Karnataka

2. DEEPAK JOSEPH XAVIER

S/O LATE VINCENT XAVEIR, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/A FLAT NO.0001, KAMADHENU APARTMENT, RAMAKRISHNAPPA ROAD, COX TOWN, BANGALORE-560005. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RASHMI PATEL., HCGP FOR R1; SRI. B. SIDDESWARA., ADVOCATE FOR R2) -2- THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC PRAYING TO QUASH THE COMPLAINT, FIR IN CR.NO.146/2022 PERTAINING TO THE KOTHANOOR P.S., AND ALL THE FURTHER PROCEEDINGS, PENDING ON THE FILE OF 11TH A.C.M.M., MAYO HALL, BENGALURU FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 323, 324, 344, 363 R/W 34 OF IPC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ

ORAL ORDER

It is submitted by the learned High Court Government Pleader that the police have filed B report in this case and the said B report is accepted by the learned Magistrate.

2. In view of the above submission, petition seeking quashing of the proceedings does not survive for consideration.

3. Accordingly, petition is disposed of.

4. I.A.No.1/2022 is disposed of. Sd/- (MOHAMMAD NAWAZ) JUDGE LDC:List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial