Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

M.Ilavarasi vs the Assistant Executive Engineer

M.Ilavarasi vs The Assistant Executive Engineer

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jan 30, 2025
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1748360

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WMP/3507/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

M.Ilavarasi

Respondent

The Assistant Executive Engineer

Excerpt

in and [order of the court was made by m.sundar. j.,] this order will now dispose of the captioned 'writ miscellaneous petition' [hereinafter 'wmp' for the sake of brevity].2. captioned wmp has been filed with a prayer to dispense withproduction of 'original two impugned orders, one dated 27.12.2024 issued by r2 and another dated 21.01.2025 issued by r1' {hereinafter 'impugned orders' for the sake of brevity, convenience and clarity}.3. mr.n.manoharan, learned counsel on record for writ petitioner is before this court. page nos.1/2 and mk4. learned counsel for writ petitioner adverting to support affidavit submitted that the original impugned orders were affixed on the outer wall and hence, the writ petitioner is not able to file the original impugned orders.5. in the light of the narrative thus far, dispense with prayer is acceded to. captioned wmp is ordered as prayed for. [m.s., j] [k.r.s., j] 30.01.2025 mk in page nos.2/2

Full Judgment

in and [Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR. J.,] This order will now dispose of the captioned 'Writ Miscellaneous Petition' [hereinafter 'WMP' for the sake of brevity].

2. Captioned WMP has been filed with a prayer to dispense with

production of 'original two impugned orders, one dated 27.12.2024 issued by R2 and another dated 21.01.2025 issued by R1' {hereinafter 'impugned orders' for the sake of brevity, convenience and clarity}.

3. Mr.N.Manoharan, learned counsel on record for writ petitioner is before this Court. Page Nos.1/2 and mk

4. Learned counsel for writ petitioner adverting to support affidavit submitted that the original impugned orders were affixed on the outer wall and hence, the writ petitioner is not able to file the original impugned orders.

5. In the light of the narrative thus far, dispense with prayer is acceded to. Captioned WMP is ordered as prayed for. [M.S., J] [K.R.S., J] 30.01.2025 mk in Page Nos.2/2

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial