Prakash vs the State of Karnataka

Prakash vs The State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Jul 30, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1745974

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1745974
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: R. Nataraj
Decided On: Jul 30, 2025
Case Number: WP/23333/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Prakash

Respondent

The State of Karnataka

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 30th day of july, 2025 before the hon'ble mr. justice r. nataraj writ petition no. 23333 of 2021 (gm-res) between: prakash s/o lankappa, aged about 46 years, residing at yellama temple road, nagamangala town, mandya district-571432 …petitioner (by sri. ajit p.b., advocate (absent)) and:1. the state of karnatakarepresented by the department of animal husbandry and fisheries, represented by its secretary, digitally no.405, iv floor, vikasa soudha, signed by bengaluru-560001 suma location: email: [email protected] high court of 2. karnataka directorate of fisheries 3rd floor, podium block, visvesvaraya centre, dr. ambedkar veedhi, bengaluru-01, represented by its director,3. the deputy director department of fisheries, near taluk office, mandya. email: [email protected] -2-4. palagrahara grama panchayat kasaba hobli, mandya-571432 represented by its president amendment of impleadment carried out vide order dated 18.12.2021 …respondents (by sri. m. srinivas kumar, high court government pleader for respondent nos.1 to 3; notice served on respondent no.4) this wp is filed under articles 226 and 227 of theconstitution of india praying to direct the respondents to extend the benefit of order dated 29.06.2021 bearing no.psm/e-62/mee 2021 passed by the 1st respondent and theorder dated 29.06.2021 bearing no.dof-tech0all2/81/2021e-502845 passed by the 2nd respondent to the petitioner as well, vide annexure-a and annexure-b and etc.,this petition, coming on for orders, this day, orderwas made therein as under: coram: hon'ble mr. justice r. natarajoral orderthe learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking permission of this court to withdraw this writ petition, as it has become infructous. -3-2. the memo is taken on record. in view of the memo, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, as it has become infructuous. sd/- (r. nataraj) judge hj list no.: 1 sl no.: 13

Full Judgment

-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 23333 OF 2021 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: PRAKASH S/O LANKAPPA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, RESIDING AT YELLAMA TEMPLE ROAD, NAGAMANGALA TOWN, MANDYA DISTRICT-571432 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. AJIT P.B., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

REPRESENTED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND FISHERIES, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, Digitally NO.405, IV FLOOR, VIKASA SOUDHA, signed by BENGALURU-560001 SUMA Location: Email: [email protected] HIGH COURT OF 2. KARNATAKA DIRECTORATE OF FISHERIES 3RD FLOOR, PODIUM BLOCK, VISVESVARAYA CENTRE, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-01, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR,

3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES, NEAR TALUK OFFICE, MANDYA. Email: [email protected] -2-

4. PALAGRAHARA GRAMA PANCHAYAT KASABA HOBLI, MANDYA-571432 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT AMENDMENT OF IMPLEADMENT CARRIED OUT VIDE ORDER DATED 18.12.2021 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M. SRINIVAS KUMAR, HIGH COURT GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR RESPONDENT NOS.1 TO 3; NOTICE SERVED ON RESPONDENT NO.4) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO EXTEND THE BENEFIT OF ORDER DATED 29.06.2021 BEARING NO.PSM/E-62/MEE 2021 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT AND THE

ORDER DATED 29.06.2021 BEARING NO.DOF-TECH0ALL2/81/2021

E-502845 PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER AS WELL, VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ANNEXURE-B AND ETC.,

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER

WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ

ORAL ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition, as it has become infructous. -3-

2. The memo is taken on record. In view of the memo, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, as it has become infructuous. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE HJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2025 Same Parties Prakash vs The State of Karnataka Same Judge R. Nataraj