Naresh Kumar vs Swamy Vivekananda Educational Trust

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Jul 31, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1745531

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1745531
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: M.Nagaprasanna
Decided On: Jul 31, 2025
Case Number: WP/21948/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Naresh Kumar

Respondent

Swamy Vivekananda Educational Trust

Excerpt

.....praying to quash the orderdated 19.06.2025 passed in com.o.s.no.47/2025, bengaluru city produced as annexure-b and further allow the petition and etc. -3- this petition, coming on for orders, this day,order was made therein as under:coram: hon'ble mr. justice m.nagaprasannaoral orderthe petitioners are before this court seeking the following prayers: "a) by way of a writ of certiorari or any otherappropriate writ, direction or order, quash the orderdated 19-6-2025 passed in com.o.s. no.47/2025, bengaluru city, produced as annexure 'b' and further allow the petition; b) by way of a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, direction or order permitting the petitioners for filing their defence through written statement and further direct the trail court to taken on record for adjudication in accordance with law; c) pass such order or orders as this hon'ble court deems fit."2. learned counsel for the petitioners after arguing thematter at length would restrict his prayer to permit the petitioners to cross-examine the plaintiffs or their witnesses in accordance with law. it is made clear that non-filing of written statement cannot be used to deny cross-examination by any means, in accordance with law. -4-3. with the aforesaid observations, petition stands disposed. sd/- (m.nagaprasanna) judge cbc list no.: 1 sl no.: 21

Full Judgment

-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 21948 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
1. NARESH KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS.
2. DINESH KUMAR,

AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS. BOTH ARE R/O NO.27, …PETITIONERS Digitally signed (BY SRI. THYAGARAJ M., ADVOCATE) by NAGAVENI AND: Location: High Court of Karnataka 1. SWAMY VIVEKANANDA EDUCATIONAL TRUST, A REGISTERED TRUST HAVING OFFICE AT MANDUR VILLAGE, VIRGONAGAR POST, BUDIGERE CROSS, DEVANAHALLI ROAD, HOSKOTE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 560 049. REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT VISHNU KUMAR, S/O BIDARAM, -2- AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O GR SUN VILLA, NIMBEKAYIPURA, BIDARAHALLI,

2. AKSHAY KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, R/O NO.27,

3. ASHAPURA HARDWARE AND GLASS PLYWOOD,

A PROPRIETORSHIP REPRESENTED BY AKSHAY KUMAR, DINESH KUMAR, AND NARESH KUMAR, HAVING OFFICE AT SY.NO. 101, K. DOMMASANDRA, WHITEFIELD MAIN ROAD, SONNENAHALLI, K.R.PURAM, BENGALURU - 560 007. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI SWAROOP S., ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER

DATED 19.06.2025 PASSED IN COM.O.S.NO.47/2025, BENGALURU CITY PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-B AND FURTHER ALLOW THE PETITION AND ETC. -3- THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

ORAL ORDER

The petitioners are before this Court seeking the following prayers: "a) by way of a writ of certiorari or any other

appropriate Writ, Direction or Order, quash the order

dated 19-6-2025 passed in Com.O.S. No.47/2025, Bengaluru City, produced as Annexure 'B' and further allow the Petition; b) by way of a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate Writ, Direction or Order permitting the Petitioners for filing their defence through written statement and further direct the trail court to taken on record for adjudication in accordance with law; c) pass such order or orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit."

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners after arguing the

matter at length would restrict his prayer to permit the petitioners to cross-examine the plaintiffs or their witnesses in accordance with law. It is made clear that non-filing of Written Statement cannot be used to deny cross-examination by any means, in accordance with law. -4-

3. With the aforesaid observations, petition stands disposed. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE CBC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2025 Same Parties Naresh Kumar vs Swamy Vivekananda Educational Trust Same Judge M.Nagaprasanna