Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Roshan R Shetty vs State of Karnataka

Roshan R Shetty vs State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Jul 31, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1745514

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL.P/10382/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Roshan R Shetty

Respondent

State of Karnataka

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 31st day of july, 2025 before the hon'ble mr. justice sachin shankar magadum criminal petition no. 10382 of 2025 between: roshan r shetty s/o. k. rathnakara shetty, aged about 31 years, residing at h. no. 3-15, ambadebettu muduperampalli, perampalli village, udupi - 576 225. …petitioner (by sri. nishit kumar shetty, advocate) and:1. state of karnatakarepresented by station house officer, digitally signed udupi town police station, by chaithra a location: high represented by state public prosecutor, court of high court buildings, karnataka bangalore - 560 001.2. sharath. t prakash. t, aged about 39 years, working as manager, at sanvi traders, kalsanka ambagilu road, gundibailu, shivalli village, -2- udupi - 576 102. …respondents (by smt. rashmi jadhav, addl. spp for r1) this crl.p is filed u/s 482 of cr.p.c (u/s 528 bnss)praying to allow the petition and to quash the entire proceedings against the petitioner in cc.no.766/2025 arising out of cr.no.67/2024 of udupi town p.s., for the offences p/u/s 408, 420 of ipc, pending on the file of principal civil judge and jmfc court, udupi. this petition, coming on for admission, this day,order was made therein as under:coram: hon'ble mr. justice sachin shankar magadumoral orderlearned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that there is a possibility of settlement and therefore, the petitioner does not intend to prosecute this petition. recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, this criminal petition is dismissed as withdrawn. sd/- (sachin shankar magadum) judge hdk list no.: 1 sl no.: 2 ct: bhk

Full Judgment

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 10382 OF 2025 BETWEEN: ROSHAN R SHETTY S/O. K. RATHNAKARA SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, RESIDING AT H. NO. 3-15, AMBADEBETTU MUDUPERAMPALLI, PERAMPALLI VILLAGE, UDUPI - 576 225. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NISHIT KUMAR SHETTY, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA

REPRESENTED BY STATION HOUSE OFFICER, Digitally signed UDUPI TOWN POLICE STATION, by CHAITHRA A Location: HIGH REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, COURT OF HIGH COURT BUILDINGS, KARNATAKA BANGALORE - 560 001.

2. SHARATH. T PRAKASH. T, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, WORKING AS MANAGER, AT SANVI TRADERS, KALSANKA AMBAGILU ROAD, GUNDIBAILU, SHIVALLI VILLAGE, -2- UDUPI - 576 102. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. RASHMI JADHAV, ADDL. SPP FOR R1) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C (U/S 528 BNSS)

PRAYING TO ALLOW THE PETITION AND TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE PETITIONER IN CC.NO.766/2025 ARISING OUT OF CR.NO.67/2024 OF UDUPI TOWN P.S., FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 408, 420 OF IPC, PENDING ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, UDUPI. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM

ORAL ORDER

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that there is a possibility of settlement and therefore, the petitioner does not intend to prosecute this petition. Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, this criminal petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE HDK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2 CT: BHK

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial