Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

T.Devanathan Yadav vs the State Rep by Its,

T.Devanathan Yadav vs The State Rep by Its,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Apr 29, 2025
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1740697

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL OP/2005/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

T.Devanathan Yadav

Respondent

The State Rep by Its,

Excerpt

and and this matter is posted today before this court under the caption 'for being mentioned' at the instance of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.2. the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that on29.04.2025, this criminal original petition had been dismissed as withdrawn and the connected criminal miscellaneous petition had also been closed. however, in the order, the criminal original petition number is wrongly mentioned as 9276 of 2025 instead of 2005 of 2025, and the criminal miscellaneous petition number is also wrongly mentioned as 2005 of 2025 instead of 9276 of 2025. thus, he prayed for suitable directions.3. considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for thepetitioner, registry is directed to issue an order copy afresh forthwith by making necessary corrections in the order dated 29.04.2025 in crl.o.p.no.2005 of 2025 and crl.m.p.no.9276 of 2025. issue order copy today upload order copy forthwith dk and dk and

Full Judgment

and and This matter is posted today before this Court under the caption 'For Being Mentioned' at the instance of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that on

29.04.2025, this Criminal Original Petition had been dismissed as withdrawn and the connected Criminal Miscellaneous Petition had also been closed. However, in the order, the Criminal Original Petition number is wrongly mentioned as 9276 of 2025 instead of 2005 of 2025, and the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition number is also wrongly mentioned as 2005 of 2025 instead of 9276 of 2025. Thus, he prayed for suitable directions.

3. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the

petitioner, Registry is directed to issue an order copy afresh forthwith by making necessary corrections in the order dated 29.04.2025 in Crl.O.P.No.2005 of 2025 and Crl.M.P.No.9276 of 2025. Issue order copy today Upload order copy forthwith dk and dk and

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2025 Same Parties T.Devanathan Yadav vs The State Rep by Its, Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice Sunder Mohan

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales