Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

The Branch Manager vs Lakshmi

The Branch Manager vs Lakshmi

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Mar 28, 2025
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1740440

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CMP/5981/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Branch Manager

Respondent

Lakshmi

Excerpt

c.m.p.no.5981 of 2025 in c.m.a(sr).no.11029 of 2025s.sounthar, j.notice to 5th respondent is already dispensed with by order dated 14.03.2025.2. mr.m.selvam, learned counsel takes notice for the respondents 1 to 4.3. heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents 1 to 4.4. having satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, the delay of 100 days in filing the above cma is condoned.5. registry is directed to print the name of mr.m.selvam, learned counsel for the respondents 1 to 4 at the time of admission. nr 28.03.2025 note:registry is directed to number the cma and list it for admission, if it is otherwise in order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Full Judgment

C.M.P.No.5981 of 2025 in C.M.A(Sr).No.11029 of 2025

S.SOUNTHAR, J.

Notice to 5th respondent is already dispensed with by order dated 14.03.2025.

2. Mr.M.Selvam, learned counsel takes notice for the respondents 1 to 4.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents 1 to 4.

4. Having satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, the delay of 100 days in filing the above CMA is condoned.

5. Registry is directed to print the name of Mr.M.Selvam, learned counsel for the respondents 1 to 4 at the time of admission. nr 28.03.2025 Note:Registry is directed to number the CMA and list it for admission, if it is otherwise in order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial