C.Divya vs the Secretary

C.Divya vs The Secretary

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Mar 05, 2025

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1739160

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1739160
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice S. M. Subramaniam,Honourable Mr.Justice K.Rajasekar
Decided On: Mar 05, 2025
Case Number: WP/2840/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

C.Divya

Respondent

The Secretary

Excerpt

.....for petitioner : mr.p.subba reddy for rr1, 2 & 5 : mr.v.jeeva giridharan additional government pleader for r3 : mr.y.bhuvanesh kumar senior counsel for cmda for r4 : mr.p.srinivas for r6 : mr.b.senthil kumar for r7 : mr.j.venkar ramanorder(order of the court was made by s.m.subramaniam,j.) the writ of mandamus has been instituted to direct the third and fourth respondents to dispose the petitioner's representation dated 14.10.2024 and to initiate suitable action to remove the unauthorized construction put up by the 6 th and 7th respondents.2. mr.p.srinivas, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the fourthrespondent - the commissioner, tambaram city municipal corporation would submit that field inspection will be conducted by following the procedures as contemplated and all appropriate further actions also will be initiated, if any unauthorized constructions/deviations are identified.3. in view of the said submission, no further adjudication is required. the fourth respondent is directed to proceed with the matter and conclude the same as expeditiously as possible.4. the writ petition stands disposed of. this court has not considered theallegations and counter allegations raised between the parties, which are all to be looked in to by the competent authorities while conducting inspection and enquiry and by affording opportunity. there shall be no order as to costs. (s.m.s., j.) (k.r.s., j.) 05.03.2025 ssi index: yes speaking order: yes/no neutral citation case : yes/no to1. the secretary, housing and urban development department, fort st-george, chennai - 600 009.2. the district collector, gst road, vembakkam, chengalpattu - 603 111.3. the member secretary, chennai metropolitan development authority, thala muthu natarajar maligai, egmore, chennai - 600 008.4. the commissioner, tambaram city municipal corporation, no.28, muthurangam street, tambaram west, chennai - 600 045. 5.the thasildhar, gst road, tambaram.s.m.subramaniam., j.andk......

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 05.03.2025
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR Writ Petition No.2840 of 2025 Mrs.C.Divya ... Petitioner Vs.
1. The Secretary, Housing and Urban Development Department, Fort St-George, Chennai - 600 009.
2. The District Collector, GST Road, Vembakkam, Chengalpattu - 603 111.
3. The Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Thala Muthu Natarajar Maligai, Egmore, Chennai - 600 008.
4. The Commissioner, Tambaram City Municipal Corporation, No.28, Muthurangam Street, Tambaram West, Chennai - 600 045. 5.The Thasildhar, GST Road, Tambaram.
6. C.Mohanraj
7. C.Maheshkumar ... Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus to direct the third and fourth respondents to dispose the petitioner's representation dated 14.10.2024 and to initiate suitable action to remove the unauthorized construction put up by the 6th and 7th respondents. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Subba Reddy For RR1, 2 & 5 : Mr.V.Jeeva Giridharan Additional Government Pleader For R3 : Mr.Y.Bhuvanesh Kumar Senior Counsel for CMDA For R4 : Mr.P.Srinivas For R6 : Mr.B.Senthil Kumar For R7 : Mr.J.Venkar Raman

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J.) The writ of mandamus has been instituted to direct the third and fourth respondents to dispose the petitioner's representation dated 14.10.2024 and to initiate suitable action to remove the unauthorized construction put up by the 6 th and 7th respondents.

2. Mr.P.Srinivas, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the fourth

respondent - the Commissioner, Tambaram City Municipal Corporation would submit that field inspection will be conducted by following the procedures as contemplated and all appropriate further actions also will be initiated, if any unauthorized constructions/deviations are identified.

3. In view of the said submission, no further adjudication is required. The fourth respondent is directed to proceed with the matter and conclude the same as expeditiously as possible.

4. The writ petition stands disposed of. This Court has not considered the

allegations and counter allegations raised between the parties, which are all to be looked in to by the competent authorities while conducting inspection and enquiry and by affording opportunity. There shall be no order as to costs. (S.M.S., J.) (K.R.S., J.) 05.03.2025 ssi Index: Yes Speaking Order: Yes/No Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No To

1. The Secretary, Housing and Urban Development Department, Fort St-George, Chennai - 600 009.

2. The District Collector, GST Road, Vembakkam, Chengalpattu - 603 111.

3. The Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Thala Muthu Natarajar Maligai, Egmore, Chennai - 600 008.

4. The Commissioner, Tambaram City Municipal Corporation, No.28, Muthurangam Street, Tambaram West, Chennai - 600 045. 5.The Thasildhar, GST Road, Tambaram.

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM., J.

AND

K. RAJASEKAR., J.

ssi 05.03.2025

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2025 Same Parties C.Divya vs The Secretary Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice S. M. Subramaniam,Honourable Mr.Justice...