Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Geetha vs Sudappa

Geetha vs Sudappa

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jan 31, 2025
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1737838

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CMP/2025/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Geetha

Respondent

Sudappa

Excerpt

cmp.no.2025 of 2025 in cma.sr.no.10634 of 2025m.dhandapani, j.this petition has been filed to condone the delay of 248 days in filing the above appeal.2. heard the learned counsel for thepetitioners and the learned counsel appearing for the second respondent. in view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, notice to the first respondent is dispensed with.3. being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this court is inclined to order this petition.4. accordingly this petition is allowed. registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order and post the matter for admission.5. it is underscored that in the eventuality of the appellants succeeding in the appeal to be taken on record, they would not be entitled to interest for default period. 31.01.2025 ssb 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Full Judgment

CMP.No.2025 of 2025 in CMA.SR.No.10634 of 2025

M.DHANDAPANI, J.

This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 248 days in filing the above appeal.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the

petitioners and the learned counsel appearing for the second respondent. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, notice to the first respondent is dispensed with.

3. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this Court is inclined to order this petition.

4. Accordingly this Petition is allowed. Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order and post the matter for admission.

5. It is underscored that in the eventuality of the appellants succeeding in the appeal to be taken on record, they would not be entitled to interest for default period. 31.01.2025 ssb 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2025 Same Parties Geetha vs Sudappa Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales