Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Vipinkumar vs the Registrar

Vipinkumar vs The Registrar

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jan 31, 2020
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1737614

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/2751/2020

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vipinkumar

Respondent

The Registrar

Excerpt

.....operation , government secretariat, other present: sri.k.p.harish,sr.gp this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 31.01.2020, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentthe limited prayer of the petitioner is for a direction to the 2 nd respondent to consider ext.p1 representation preferred by him for conducting an election to the managing committee of the society, expeditiously.2. i have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learnedgovernment pleader for the respondents. on a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made across the bar, i dispose the writ petition with a direction to the 2nd respondent, to consider and pass orders on ext.p1 representation preferred by the petitioner within a month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioner and others likely to be affected by any orders to be passed by the 2 nd respondent. the petitioner shallproduce a copy of the writ petition together with a copy of the judgmentbefore the 2nd respondent, for further action. sd/- a.k.jayasankaran nambiar judge dxy appendix petitioner's/s exhibits: exhibit p1 true copy of the representation dated 06.01.2020 submitted by the milk farmers belonging to chorottur ksheerolpadaka sahakarana sangham before the deputy director, diary development department palakkad. exhibit p2 true copy of the postal receipt dated 13.01.2020 showing postage of ext.p1 to the deputy director, diary development department, palakkad. exhibit p3 true copy of the postal acknowledgment dated 17.01.2020 showing delivery of ext.p1 to the deputy director, diary development department, palakkad.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR FRIDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY 2020 / 11TH MAGHA, 1941 PETITIONER/S: VIPINKUMAR AGED 42 YEARS S/O.RAMAKRISHNAN, PULIKKAL HOUSE, CHOROTTUR P.O., VANIYAMKULAM, OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.P.JAYARAM SHRI.AKHIL P RESPONDENT/S: 1 THE REGISTRAR CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 2 THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, DIARY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, CIVIL STATION, PALAKKAD-678001.

3 THE ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE, CHOROTTUR KSHEEROLPATHAKA SAHAKARANA SANGHAM P 331(D), P.O.CHOROTTUR -679521, REPRESENTED BY ITS CONVENER. 4 THE DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF DIARY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, 5 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CO- OPERATION , GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, OTHER PRESENT: SRI.K.P.HARISH,SR.GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31.01.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

The limited prayer of the petitioner is for a direction to the 2 nd respondent to consider Ext.P1 representation preferred by him for conducting an election to the Managing Committee of the Society, expeditiously.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned

Government Pleader for the respondents. On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made across the Bar, I dispose the writ petition with a direction to the 2nd respondent, to consider and pass orders on Ext.P1 representation preferred by the petitioner within a month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioner and others likely to be affected by any orders to be passed by the 2 nd respondent. The petitioner shall

produce a copy of the writ petition together with a copy of the judgment

before the 2nd respondent, for further action. Sd/- A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE Dxy APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 06.01.2020 SUBMITTED BY THE MILK FARMERS BELONGING TO CHOROTTUR KSHEEROLPADAKA SAHAKARANA SANGHAM BEFORE THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, DIARY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PALAKKAD. EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE POSTAL RECEIPT DATED 13.01.2020 SHOWING POSTAGE OF EXT.P1 TO THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, DIARY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, PALAKKAD. EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE POSTAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT DATED 17.01.2020 SHOWING DELIVERY OF EXT.P1 TO THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, DIARY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, PALAKKAD.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial