Rasheed K.M., vs the Secretary,

Rasheed K.M., vs The Secretary,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jan 31, 2020

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1737459

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1737459
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Dr. Justice a.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar
Decided On: Jan 31, 2020
Case Number: WP(C)/2704/2020

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rasheed K.M.,

Respondent

The Secretary,

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice a.k.jayasankaran nambiar friday, the 31st day of january 2020 / 11th magha, 1941 wp(c).no.2704 of 2020(k) petitioner/s: rasheed k.m.,s/o.u.mohammed karanchery house, nedumpura post, thrissur. by adv. sri.g.prabhakaran respondent/s: the secretary, regional transport authority cum regional transport officer, palakkad, civil station, s fort road, kenathu parambu, kunathurmedu, palakkad-678002. smt.c.s.sheeja,sr.gp this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 31.01.2020, the court on the same day delivered the following: wp(c).no.2704 of 2020(k) 2judgmentthe petitioner has preferred ext.p2 request before the respondent for revision of timings pertaining to the vehicle that he is operating. the limited prayer is for a direction to the respondent to consider and pass orders on ext.p2 request expeditiously, after hearing the petitioner.2. i have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned government pleader for the respondent. on a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and thesubmissions made across the bar, i dispose the writ petition with a direction to the respondent to consider and pass orders on ext.p2 request for revision of timing within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioner and others likely to be affected by any orders to be passed by the respondent. the petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition together with a copy of the judgment before the respondent for further action.a.k.jayasankaran nambiar judge sd wp(c).no.2704 of 2020(k) 3 appendix petitioner's/s exhibits: exhibit p1 true copy of the rta proceedings showing the time schedule dated 6.8.2014. exhibit p2 true copy of the request filed by the petitioner before the respondent dated 14.1.2020 on the route nedumpura-pattambi with stage carriage kl-46-3009 along with proposed timings.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR FRIDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY 2020 / 11TH MAGHA, 1941 WP(C).No.2704 OF 2020(K) PETITIONER/S: RASHEED K.M.,S/O.U.MOHAMMED KARANCHERY HOUSE, NEDUMPURA POST, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENT/S: THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY CUM REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, PALAKKAD, CIVIL STATION, S FORT ROAD, KENATHU PARAMBU, KUNATHURMEDU, PALAKKAD-678002. SMT.C.S.SHEEJA,SR.GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31.01.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No.2704 OF 2020(K) 2

JUDGMENT

The petitioner has preferred Ext.P2 request before the respondent for revision of timings pertaining to the vehicle that he is operating. The limited prayer is for a direction to the respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P2 request expeditiously, after hearing the petitioner.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for the respondent. On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and the

submissions made across the Bar, I dispose the writ petition with a direction to the respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P2 request for revision of timing within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioner and others likely to be affected by any orders to be passed by the respondent. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition together with a copy of the judgment before the respondent for further action.

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE sd WP(C).No.2704 OF 2020(K) 3 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE RTA PROCEEDINGS SHOWING THE TIME SCHEDULE DATED 6.8.2014. EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT DATED 14.1.2020 ON THE ROUTE NEDUMPURA-PATTAMBI WITH STAGE CARRIAGE KL-46-3009 ALONG WITH PROPOSED TIMINGS.

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2020 Same Parties Rasheed K.M., vs The Secretary, Same Judge Honourable Dr. Justice a.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar