Rijo, vs State of Kerala,

RIJO, vs State of Kerala,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jan 31, 2020

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1735838

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1735838
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr. Justice Sunil Thomas
Decided On: Jan 31, 2020
Case Number: Bail Appl./699/2020

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

RIJO,

Respondent

State of Kerala,

Excerpt

.....ernakulam, pin-682031. 2 the sub inspector punalur police station, kollam, pin-691305. sr.pp sri.c.n prabhakaran this bail application having come up for admission on 31.01.2020, the court on the same day passed the following:orderthe petitioner herein stands arrayed as the third accused in crime no.117/2020 of punalur police station for offences punishable under sections 341, 323, 324, 294(b) 326 read with section 34 of the indian penal code.2. the allegation of the prosecution is that20.01.2020 at 12.30 am., the petitioner along with two other accused hit the defacto complainant and caused serious injuries. the accused were arrested on 22.01.2020.3. the petitioner has no criminal antecedents. italso indicate that it was not a premeditated calculated attack. having considered these facts, i am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner herein on the following conditions:(i) petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of rs.40,000/- (rupees forty thousand only) with two sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional court.(ii) he shall appear before the investigating officer on all tuesdays between 9 am and 10 am for one month from the date of his release.(iii) he shall not get involved in any other crime and breach of it, will be a ground for cancellation of bail in this case. bail application is allowed as above. sd/- sunil thomas, judge r.av //true copy// ps to judge appendixpetitioner's exhibits: annexure a1 certified copy of order in cmp.no.500/2020 of judicial first magristrate court- punalur annexure a2 true copy of remand report filed by 2nd respondent before magistrate court, punalur respondent's exhibits: nil

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS FRIDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY 2020 / 11TH MAGHA, 1941 AGAINST THE ORDER IN CMP 500/2020 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS -I, PUNALUR CRIME NO.117/2020 OF PUNALUR POLICE STATION, KOLLAM PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.3: RIJO, AGED 26 YEARS S/O. JOSEPH, KAITHATHOTTATHIL VEEDU, NEDUNKAYAM, PAPERMILL MURI, PUNALUR, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.M.R.SASITH RESPONDENT/S: 1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN-682031. 2 THE SUB INSPECTOR PUNALUR POLICE STATION, KOLLAM, PIN-691305. SR.PP SRI.C.N PRABHAKARAN THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31.01.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

The petitioner herein stands arrayed as the third accused in Crime No.117/2020 of Punalur Police Station for offences punishable under sections 341, 323, 324, 294(b) 326 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. The allegation of the prosecution is that

20.01.2020 at 12.30 am., the petitioner along with two other accused hit the defacto complainant and caused serious injuries. The accused were arrested on 22.01.2020.

3. The petitioner has no criminal antecedents. It

also indicate that it was not a premeditated calculated attack. Having considered these facts, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner herein on the following conditions:

(i) Petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.40,000/- (Rupees forty thousand only) with two sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Court.

(ii) He shall appear before the investigating officer on all Tuesdays between 9 am and 10 am for one month from the date of his release.

(iii) He shall not get involved in any other crime and breach of it, will be a ground for cancellation of bail in this case. Bail application is allowed as above. Sd/- SUNIL THOMAS, JUDGE R.AV //True Copy// PS to Judge APPENDIX

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: ANNEXURE A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER IN CMP.NO.500/2020 OF JUDICIAL FIRST MAGRISTRATE COURT- PUNALUR ANNEXURE A2 TRUE COPY OF REMAND REPORT FILED BY 2ND RESPONDENT BEFORE MAGISTRATE COURT, PUNALUR RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2020 Same Parties RIJO, vs State of Kerala, Same Judge Honourable Mr. Justice Sunil Thomas