Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Martin.E vs State of Kerala

Martin.E vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jan 31, 2020
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1735055

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/2728/2020

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Martin.E

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....jayasankaran nambiar, j.------------------------------------------------ w.p(c) no. 2728 of 2020 ------------------------------------------------------ dated this the 31st day of january, 2020judgmentthe limited prayer of the petitioner in the writ petition is for a direction to the 3rd respondent, before whom he has preferred ext.p4 representation for implementing ext.p3 decision in his favour to consider and pass orders on the same, expeditiously, after hearing him.2. i have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and thelearned government pleader for the respondents. on a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made across the bar, i dispose the writ petition with a direction to the 3rd respondent to consider and pass orders on ext.p4 representation within a month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioner and others likely to be affected by any orders to be passed by the 3 rd respondent. the petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition together with a copy of the judgment before the 3rd respondent, for further action. sd/- a.k.jayasankaran nambiar judge dxy appendix petitioner's/s exhibits: exhibit p1 the true copy of the judgment dated 15.12.2015 in wpc no 24197/2010 before this hon'ble court exhibit p2 the true copy of the letter no 1757/19 dated 25.9.2019 issued by the 4th respondent exhibit p3 the true copy of the decision dated 15.11.2003 of the 6th respondent society exhibit p4 the true copy of the representation dated 9.10.2019 submitted by the petitioner before the respondent no 3

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR FRIDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY 2020 / 11TH MAGHA, 1941 PETITIONER/S: MARTIN.E AGED 66 YEARS S/O IGNATIUS H.NO 7, CO-OPERATIVE COLONY, POLAYATHODU,KOLLAM-691 010 BY ADVS. SRI.C.R.VIJAYAKUMARAN PILLAI SRI.R.SANTHOSH (VARKALA) SRI.A.CHANDRA BABU RESPONDENT/S:

1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPT OF HOUSING, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 2 THE SECRETARY TO THE CO-OPERATIVE DEPARTMENT, GOVT OF KERALA, GOVT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 3 THE REGISTRAR (GENERAL) OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES, JAWAHAR SAHAKARANA BHAVAN, DPI JUNCTION, THYCAUD P.O.TRIVANDRUM-695 014. 4 THE JOINT REGISTRAR (GENERAL) OF CO-OPERATIVE OFFICE OF THE JOINT REGISTRAR (GENERAL) OF CO- OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, MULLACKKAL, KOLLAM-688 011. 5 THE ASST REGISTRAR (GENERAL) OF CO-OPERATIVE OFFICE OF THE ASST.REGISTRAR (GENERAL) OF CO- OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, VADDY-CIVIL STATION ROAD, VIDHYS NAGAR, KOLLAM-691 013. 6 VADDY CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY NO. 1532, VADDY, KOLLAM REPRESENTED BY ITS ADMINISTRATOR, ASST. REGISTRAR (GENERAL) OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, OFFICE OF THE ASST. REGISTRAR (GENERAL) OF CO-OPERATIVE

SOCIETIES,VADDY-CIVIL STATION ROAD, VIDHYA NAGAR, KOLLAM-691 013. OTHER PRESENT: SMT.C.S.SHEEJA,SR.GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31.01.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

A.K. JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.

------------------------------------------------ W.P(C) No. 2728 of 2020 ------------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 31st day of January, 2020

JUDGMENT

The limited prayer of the petitioner in the writ petition is for a direction to the 3rd respondent, before whom he has preferred Ext.P4 representation for implementing Ext.P3 decision in his favour to consider and pass orders on the same, expeditiously, after hearing him.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the

learned Government Pleader for the respondents. On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made across the Bar, I dispose the writ petition with a direction to the 3rd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P4 representation within a month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioner and others likely to be affected by any orders to be passed by the 3 rd respondent. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition together with a copy of the judgment before the 3rd respondent, for further action. Sd/- A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE Dxy APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 15.12.2015 IN WPC NO 24197/2010 BEFORE THIS HON'BLE COURT EXHIBIT P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO 1757/19 DATED 25.9.2019 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE DECISION DATED 15.11.2003 OF THE 6TH RESPONDENT SOCIETY EXHIBIT P4 THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 9.10.2019 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT NO 3

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial