Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Akhil vs State of Kerala

AKHIL vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jan 31, 2020
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1734653

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./585/2020

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

AKHIL

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice p.b.suresh kumar friday, the 31st day of january 2020 / 11th magha, 1941 bail appl..no.585 of 2020 against the order/judgment in crmp 4665/2020 dated 18-12- 2020 of special court under pocso act, thrissur crime no.632/2019 of nedupuzha police station , thrissur applicant/accused: akhil, aged 19 years s/o alex, pallikarayil house, elthuruthu post, laloor desom, aranattukara village, thrissur-680 618. by advs. sri.p.vijaya bhanu (sr.) sri.p.m.rafiq sri.m.revikrishnan sri.vipin narayan sri.ajeesh k.sasi sri.v.c.sarath smt.pooja pankaj sruthy n. bhat respondent/complainant: state of kerala represented by public prosecutor, high court of kerala, ernakulam-682 031. other present: p p-sri amjad ali this bail application having come up for admission on 31.01.2020, the court on the same day passed the following: ..2.. --------------------------------------orderthe learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the bail application. the permission sought for is granted and the bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. sd/- p.b.suresh kumar judge ds 04.02.2020

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR FRIDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY 2020 / 11TH MAGHA, 1941 Bail Appl..No.585 OF 2020 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CRMP 4665/2020 DATED 18-12- 2020 OF SPECIAL COURT UNDER POCSO ACT, THRISSUR CRIME NO.632/2019 OF Nedupuzha Police Station , Thrissur APPLICANT/ACCUSED: AKHIL, AGED 19 YEARS S/O ALEX, PALLIKARAYIL HOUSE, ELTHURUTHU POST, LALOOR DESOM, ARANATTUKARA VILLAGE, THRISSUR-680 618. BY ADVS. SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU (SR.) SRI.P.M.RAFIQ SRI.M.REVIKRISHNAN SRI.VIPIN NARAYAN SRI.AJEESH K.SASI SRI.V.C.SARATH SMT.POOJA PANKAJ SRUTHY N. BHAT RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT: STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682 031. OTHER PRESENT: P P-SRI AMJAD ALI THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31.01.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ..2.. --------------------------------------

ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the bail application. The permission sought for is granted and the bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- P.B.SURESH KUMAR JUDGE ds 04.02.2020

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial