D.Arjunan vs the District Collector

D.Arjunan vs The District Collector

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Feb 26, 2025

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1731471

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1731471
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan
Decided On: Feb 26, 2025
Case Number: WP/6551/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

D.Arjunan

Respondent

The District Collector

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 26.02.2025coram:the honourable mr. justice g.k.ilanthiraiyan d.arjunan ... petitioner vs.5. the inspector of police, uthangarai police station, uthangarai. ... respondentsprayer : the writ petition is filed under article 226 of the constitution of india for issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the fourth respondent to take immediate action on consideration my representation dated 04.12.2024 and to grant the necessary permission for the erection of the flag port at my property bearing patta no.393, situated at rettipatti panchayat, chennappanaickanur palaiyur village,uthangarai taluk, krishnagiri district. for petitioner : mr.a.k.samy for respondents : mr.p.balathandayutham special government pleader for r1 to r3 : mr.a.gopinath government advocate (crl.side) for r4 and r5orderwhen the matter came up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw this petition. the learned counsel has also made an endorsement in the court bundle, today, to that effect.2. in view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petition. vv to5. the public prosecutor, madras high court, chennai.g.k.ilanthiraiyan, j.vv

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 26.02.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN D.Arjunan ... Petitioner Vs.
5. The Inspector of Police, Uthangarai Police Station, Uthangarai. ... Respondents
Prayer : The Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the fourth respondent to take immediate action on consideration my representation dated 04.12.2024 and to grant the necessary permission for the erection of the flag port at my property bearing Patta No.393, situated at Rettipatti Panchayat, Chennappanaickanur Palaiyur Village,Uthangarai Taluk, Krishnagiri District. For Petitioner : Mr.A.K.Samy For Respondents : Mr.P.Balathandayutham Special Government Pleader for R1 to R3 : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for R4 and R5

ORDER

When the matter came up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. The learned counsel has also made an endorsement in the Court bundle, today, to that effect.

2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petition. Vv To

5. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai.

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2025 Same Parties D.Arjunan vs The District Collector Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan