Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

M Channappa vs Tahsildar

M Channappa vs Tahsildar

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Jul 03, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1729512

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/18717/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

M Channappa

Respondent

Tahsildar

Excerpt

.....r/at, no.170, chandana layout, sunkadakatte, magadi road, bengaluru-560001. …petitioners (by sri. pratheep k.c., advocate) -2- and:1. tahsildar k.g road, kandaya bhawana,2. assistant commissioner 2nd floor, kandaya bhavan,3. deputy commissioner bengaluru urban district,4. deputy director of land records, bengaluru-095. assistant director of land records, …respondents (by sri. siddharth baburao, aga ) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to direct the respondents to consider representation dated 04.01.2022 vide annexure-c. this petition, coming on for preliminary hearing, this day, order was made therein as under: -3- coram: hon'ble mr. justice e.s.indireshoral orderlearned additional government advocate accepts notice for the respondents.2. heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.3. the grievance of the petitioners in this writpetition is with respect to consideration of representations dated 04.01.2022 produced at annexure-c seeking to conduct phodi and durasth in respect of the subject land.4. having taken note of the submissions madeby the learned counsel appearing for the parties, and the learned additional government advocate, the petitioners are permitted to approach the respondent- authorities through the online portal. if such a online representation is submitted, the same shall be -4- considered by the respondent-authorities in accordance with law and as expeditiously as possible. with this observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. sd/- (e.s.indiresh) judge sb list no.: 1 sl no.: 32

Full Judgment

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.18717 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:

1. M. CHANNAPPA S/O CHIKKAMUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS DASANAPURA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK BENGALURU. HANUMANTHARAYAPPA SINCE DECEASED REP. BY LRS.

2. MANJUNATH

S/O LATE HANUMANTHARAYAPPA AGED : MAJOR Digitally signed by DASANAPURA HOBLI, SHARMA ANAND BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY GPA HOLDER BETTASWAMYGOWDA @ B.S GOWDA S/O LATE CHIKKEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT, NO.170, CHANDANA LAYOUT, SUNKADAKATTE, MAGADI ROAD, BENGALURU-560001. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. PRATHEEP K.C., ADVOCATE) -2- AND:

1. TAHSILDAR K.G ROAD, KANDAYA BHAWANA,

2. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER 2ND FLOOR, KANDAYA BHAVAN,

3. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT,

4. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS, BENGALURU-09

5. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS, …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SIDDHARTH BABURAO, AGA ) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER REPRESENTATION DATED 04.01.2022 VIDE ANNEXURE-C. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: -3- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH

ORAL ORDER

Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.

3. The grievance of the petitioners in this writ

petition is with respect to consideration of representations dated 04.01.2022 produced at Annexure-C seeking to conduct phodi and durasth in respect of the subject land.

4. Having taken note of the submissions made

by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, and the learned Additional Government Advocate, the petitioners are permitted to approach the respondent- authorities through the online portal. If such a online representation is submitted, the same shall be -4- considered by the respondent-authorities in accordance with law and as expeditiously as possible. With this observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 32

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2025 Same Parties M Channappa vs Tahsildar Same Judge E.S.Indiresh

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales