Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Karthik vs State of Karnataka

Karthik vs State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Sep 01, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1728678

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL.P/8138/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Karthik

Respondent

State of Karnataka

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 1st day of september, 2025 before the hon'ble mr. justice sachin shankar magadum criminal petition no.8138 of 2024 between: karthik s/o raja aged about 24 years residing at house no.8-175 narnadu, kolalagiri brahmavara taluk udupi district - 576 105…petitioner (by sri.shiva prasad nayak, advocate) and: digitally signed 1. state of karnataka by al bhagya represented by sub-inspector of police, location: high court brahmavara police station, of brahmavara taluk, karnataka udupi district - 576 213. represented by state public prosecutor, high court building, bangalore - 560 001.2. preethams/o. suresh thingalaya, aged about 33 years, kadavina bagilu, -2- kalyanapura, udupi taluk and district - 576 114. …respondents (by sri. anoop kumar, hcgp for r1) this crl.p is filed u/s 482 of cr.p.c. praying to quash the entire proceedings in c.c.no.41/2021 (cr.no.166/2020) and charge sheet in c.c.no.41/2021 pending on the file of the addl.civil judge and j.m.f.c at udupi against the petitioner for the offence p/u/s 323, 504, 506 r/w 34 of ipc by the brahmavara p.s, brahmavara. this petition, coming on for orders, this day,order was made therein as under:coram: hon'ble mr. justice sachin shankar magadumoral orderlearned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 21.04.2025 seeking permission of this court to withdraw the above petition as the matter is settled outside the court.2. the memo is taken on record.3. in view of the above said memo, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. sd/- (sachin shankar magadum) judge nbm list no.: 2 sl no.: 74

Full Judgment

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM CRIMINAL PETITION NO.8138 OF 2024 BETWEEN: KARTHIK S/O RAJA AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS RESIDING AT HOUSE NO.8-175 NARNADU, KOLALAGIRI BRAHMAVARA TALUK UDUPI DISTRICT - 576 105

…PETITIONER (BY SRI.SHIVA PRASAD NAYAK, ADVOCATE) AND: Digitally signed 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA by AL BHAGYA REPRESENTED BY SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, Location: HIGH COURT BRAHMAVARA POLICE STATION, OF BRAHMAVARA TALUK, KARNATAKA UDUPI DISTRICT - 576 213. REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001.

2. PREETHAM

S/O. SURESH THINGALAYA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, KADAVINA BAGILU, -2- KALYANAPURA, UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT - 576 114. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ANOOP KUMAR, HCGP FOR R1) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.41/2021 (CR.NO.166/2020) AND CHARGE SHEET IN C.C.NO.41/2021 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C AT UDUPI AGAINST THE PETITIONER FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 323, 504, 506 R/W 34 OF IPC BY THE BRAHMAVARA P.S, BRAHMAVARA. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM

ORAL ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 21.04.2025 seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the above petition as the matter is settled outside the Court.

2. The memo is taken on record.

3. In view of the above said memo, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE NBM List No.: 2 Sl No.: 74

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial