Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sree Ganesh Constructions vs the General Manager

Sree Ganesh Constructions vs The General Manager

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Aug 30, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1728385

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CMP/302/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sree Ganesh Constructions

Respondent

The General Manager

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 30th day of august, 2025 before the hon'ble mr. justice e.s. indiresh civil miscellaneous petition no.302 of 2023 between: sree ganesh constructions railway contractors, d.no.3-281, lakshmipuram, stonehousepet, nellore, andhra pradesh - 524 002. rep. by its managing partner, mr. kotam reddy giridhar reddy. …petitioner (by sri. h.r. narayana rao, advocte for sri. rajeswara p.n., advocate) and:1. the general managerhead quarters office, digitally signed by sharma anand 3rd floor, rail soudha, chaya east block, location: high court of south western railway, karnataka gadag road, hubli, karnataka - 580 020.2. the divisional railway manager (works) mysuru division, irwin road, mysuru - 570 021. …respondents (by smt. anuparna borodoloi, advocate) -2- this civil miscellaneous petition is filed under setion 11(6) of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 read with paragraph 2 of the appointment of arbitrators by the chief justice of karnataka high court scheme, 1996, praying to appoint an independent arbitrator to decide the dispute thathas arisen between the petitioner and the respondents pertaining to the contract agreement no.1102, 1104/2019/engg/0207 dated 14th january, 2020 vide annexure-a and pass such other order or orders as this hon'ble court deems fit, in the circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity. this petition coming on for admission, this day,order was made therein as under:coram: hon'ble mr. justice e.s.indireshoral orderlearned counsel appearing for the parties submitted that the dispute between the parties has been resolved.2. accepting the submission made by learned counselappearing for the parties, i am of the view that, no further orders are required to be made in this petition. accordingly, civil miscellaneous petition is disposed of. sd/- (e.s.indiresh) judge ark list no.: 1 sl no.: 17

Full Judgment

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO.302 OF 2023 BETWEEN: SREE GANESH CONSTRUCTIONS RAILWAY CONTRACTORS, D.NO.3-281, LAKSHMIPURAM, STONEHOUSEPET, NELLORE, ANDHRA PRADESH - 524 002. REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, MR. KOTAM REDDY GIRIDHAR REDDY. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. H.R. NARAYANA RAO, ADVOCTE FOR SRI. RAJESWARA P.N., ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE GENERAL MANAGER

HEAD QUARTERS OFFICE, Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND 3RD FLOOR, RAIL SOUDHA, CHAYA EAST BLOCK, Location: HIGH COURT OF SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY, KARNATAKA GADAG ROAD, HUBLI, KARNATAKA - 580 020.

2. THE DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER (WORKS) MYSURU DIVISION, IRWIN ROAD, MYSURU - 570 021. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. ANUPARNA BORODOLOI, ADVOCATE) -2- THIS CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION IS FILED UNDER SETION 11(6) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 READ WITH PARAGRAPH 2 OF THE APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATORS BY THE CHIEF JUSTICE OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT SCHEME, 1996, PRAYING TO APPOINT AN INDEPENDENT ARBITRATOR TO DECIDE THE DISPUTE THAT

HAS ARISEN BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND THE RESPONDENTS PERTAINING TO THE CONTRACT AGREEMENT NO.1102, 1104/2019/ENGG/0207 DATED 14TH JANUARY, 2020 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND PASS SUCH OTHER ORDER OR ORDERS AS THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT, IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH

ORAL ORDER

Learned counsel appearing for the parties submitted that the dispute between the parties has been resolved.

2. Accepting the submission made by learned counsel

appearing for the parties, I am of the view that, no further orders are required to be made in this petition. Accordingly, Civil Miscellaneous Petition is disposed of. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial