Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Jayakumar vs the State of Kerala

Jayakumar vs The State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Feb 22, 2021
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1725885

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/34608/2019

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jayakumar

Respondent

The State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice sathish ninan monday, the 22nd day of february 2021 / 3rd phalguna, 1942 wp(c).no.34608 of 2019(a) petitioner/s: jayakumar,aged 44 years s/o.ramakrishnan, vinayaka street, wadakkanchery p.o., alathur taluk, palakkad district-678 683 by adv. sri.g.sreekumar (chelur) respondent/s: 1 the state of kerala represented by the secretary to government, local self government department, government secretariat, thiruvananthapuram district-695 001 2 the wadakkanchery grama panchyath office of the wadakkanchery grama panchyath, represented by ts secretary, wadakkanchery p.o., 3 subha,aged 39 years d/o. late amantharaman, gokulam, gramom road, wadakkanchery amsom desom, wadakkanchery p.o., this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 22.02.2021, the court on the same day delivered the following: wp(c).no.34608 of 2019(a) 2judgmentthe petitioner has filed a memo seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition. memo recorded. permission granted. the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn without prejudice. sd/- sathish ninan judge sd wp(c).no.34608 of 2019(a) 3 appendix petitioner's/s exhibits: exhibit p1 a true copy of the document executed as document bearing no.342 of 09 of the wadakkanchery sro dated 28.109 exhibit p2 a true copy of the document bearing no. 2932 of 19 dated 11.11.19 of wadakkanchery sro exhibit p3 a true copy of the communication which the petitioner receives from the office of the second respondent dated 28.12.18 exhibit p4 a true copy of the caveat original petition filed by the third respondent on the petitioner dated 2.12.19 exhibit p5 a true copy of the suit filed by the petitioner as os no.427 of 2019 dated 2.12.19 before the munsiff court, alathur exhibit p6 a true copy of the complaint of the petitioner dated 29.11.19 exhibit p7 a true copy of the receipt issued dated 29.11.19 exhibit p8 a true copy of the request of the petitioner dated 30.11.19 exhibit p9 a

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN MONDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 3RD PHALGUNA, 1942 WP(C).No.34608 OF 2019(A) PETITIONER/S: JAYAKUMAR,AGED 44 YEARS S/O.RAMAKRISHNAN, VINAYAKA STREET, WADAKKANCHERY P.O., ALATHUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678 683 BY ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) RESPONDENT/S: 1 THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695 001 2 THE WADAKKANCHERY GRAMA PANCHYATH OFFICE OF THE WADAKKANCHERY GRAMA PANCHYATH, REPRESENTED BY TS SECRETARY, WADAKKANCHERY P.O., 3 SUBHA,AGED 39 YEARS D/O. LATE AMANTHARAMAN, GOKULAM, GRAMOM ROAD, WADAKKANCHERY AMSOM DESOM, WADAKKANCHERY P.O., THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No.34608 OF 2019(A) 2

JUDGMENT

The petitioner has filed a memo seeking permission to withdraw the Writ Petition. Memo recorded. Permission granted. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn without prejudice. Sd/- SATHISH NINAN JUDGE sd WP(C).No.34608 OF 2019(A) 3 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE DOCUMENT EXECUTED AS DOCUMENT BEARING NO.342 OF 09 OF THE WADAKKANCHERY SRO DATED 28.109 EXHIBIT P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE DOCUMENT BEARING NO. 2932 OF 19 DATED 11.11.19 OF WADAKKANCHERY SRO EXHIBIT P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION WHICH THE PETITIONER RECEIVES FROM THE OFFICE OF THE SECOND RESPONDENT DATED 28.12.18 EXHIBIT P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE CAVEAT ORIGINAL PETITION FILED BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT ON THE PETITIONER DATED 2.12.19 EXHIBIT P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE SUIT FILED BY THE PETITIONER AS OS NO.427 OF 2019 DATED 2.12.19 BEFORE THE MUNSIFF COURT, ALATHUR EXHIBIT P6 A TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT OF THE PETITIONER DATED 29.11.19 EXHIBIT P7 A TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED DATED 29.11.19 EXHIBIT P8 A TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST OF THE PETITIONER DATED 30.11.19 EXHIBIT P9 A TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED DATED 30.11.19 EXHIBIT P10 A TRUE COPY OF THE BUILDING PERMIT ISSUED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT TO THE THIRD RESPONDENT DATED 22.11.19 EXHIBIT P11 A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT DATED 25.10.19 EXHIBIT P12 A TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT BY THE DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF NSS COLLEGE, PALAKKAD DATED 10.12.18 EXHIBIT P13 A TRUE COPY OF THE OFFICE NOTES OF THE SECOND RESPONDENT DATED 15.11.9

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial