Andrew vs State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Jun 30, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1724369

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1724369
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: S Vishwajith Shetty
Decided On: Jun 30, 2025
Case Number: CRL.P/8192/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Andrew

Respondent

State of Karnataka

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 30th day of june, 2025 before the hon'ble mr justice s vishwajith shetty criminal petition no. 8192 of 2025 between: andrew s/o toni aged about 25 years residing at no.15, park road perumal garden, coxtown jeevanahalli, bangalore - 560 005 (in judicial custody) …petitioner (by sri d.g. sreenivasa kumar, adv.) and:state of karnataka by pulakeshinagar police station, rep high court govt. pleader high court of digitally signed by karnataka, bangalore - 560 001. nandini m s …respondent location: high court (by smt. rashmi patel, hcgp) of karnataka this crl.p is filed u/s 439 cr.pc (u/s 483 of bnss)praying to release the petitioner on bail in crime no.211/2024 (sc. no.1305/2024) of respondent pulikeshi nagar police station, bangalore registered for alleged offence p/u/s. 143, 144, 147, 148, 302, 120(b) r/w sec. 149 of ipc, pending on the file of the learned iv addl. city civil and sessions judge (cch-21) bangalore.this petition, coming on for orders, this day, orderwas made therein as under: coram: hon'ble mr justice s vishwajith shetty -2-oral order1. learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitionmay be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the petitioner to revive his bail application after material charge sheet witnesses cw14 to cw18 are examined before the trial court. he submits that considering the fact that petitioner is in custody for the last one year, the trial court may be directed to examine the aforesaid witnesses on priority.2. the submission made by learned counsel for thepetitioner is placed on record. petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as prayed for. it is needless to state that efforts shall be made by the prosecution and the trial court to examine the aforesaid witnesses on priority before the trial court. sd/- (s vishwajith shetty) judge dn

Full Judgment

-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 8192 OF 2025 BETWEEN: ANDREW S/O TONI AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.15, PARK ROAD PERUMAL GARDEN, COXTOWN JEEVANAHALLI, BANGALORE - 560 005 (IN JUDICIAL CUSTODY) …PETITIONER (BY SRI D.G. SREENIVASA KUMAR, ADV.) AND:

STATE OF KARNATAKA BY PULAKESHINAGAR POLICE STATION, REP HIGH COURT GOVT. PLEADER HIGH COURT OF Digitally signed by KARNATAKA, BANGALORE - 560 001. NANDINI M S …RESPONDENT Location: HIGH COURT (BY SMT. RASHMI PATEL, HCGP) OF KARNATAKA THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 439 CR.PC (U/S 483 OF BNSS)

PRAYING TO RELEASE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN CRIME NO.211/2024 (SC. NO.1305/2024) OF RESPONDENT PULIKESHI NAGAR POLICE STATION, BANGALORE REGISTERED FOR ALLEGED OFFENCE P/U/S. 143, 144, 147, 148, 302, 120(b) R/W SEC. 149 OF IPC, PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE LEARNED IV ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE (CCH-21) BANGALORE.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER

WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY -2-

ORAL ORDER

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petition

may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the petitioner to revive his bail application after material charge sheet witnesses CW14 to CW18 are examined before the Trial Court. He submits that considering the fact that petitioner is in custody for the last one year, the Trial Court may be directed to examine the aforesaid witnesses on priority.

2. The submission made by learned counsel for the

petitioner is placed on record. Petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as prayed for. It is needless to state that efforts shall be made by the prosecution and the Trial Court to examine the aforesaid witnesses on priority before the Trial Court. Sd/- (S VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE DN

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2025 Same Parties Andrew vs State of Karnataka Same Judge S Vishwajith Shetty