Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Nazar vs the State of Kerala

NAZAR vs The State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jul 01, 2021
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1723979

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/33453/2016

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

NAZAR

Respondent

The State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....taluk, thrissur district - 680001. 5 rajalakshmi kurumath, aged 45 years, member of ward no.vi, kattoor gramapanchayath, kattoor po, mukundapuram taluk,thrissur district - 680001. government pleader sri.k.jagadeesh sri.t.n.manoj smt.v.renjur1- sri.surin george ipe,senior government pleader r3 by sri.t.n.manoj r4 & r5 by sri.k.jagdeesh this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 01.07.2021, the court on the same day delivered the following: w.p.(c) no.33453/2016 2judgmentthis writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs: a) call for the records leading to exhibit p3 and may be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari to quash the same and to direct respondents 3 to 5 to conduct gramasabha meeting after issuing proper notice. b) to pass any such or further orders as the petitioner may seek and this hon'ble court deem fit to grant.2. the subject issue raised by the petitioner relates to a meeting conductedon 28.5.2016 by respondents 3 to 5 in ward no.vi of kattoor panchayath and the consequential proceedings. consequent to the election taken place in the year 2020, the panchayath committee is not in existence and virtually the subject matter of the decision taken in the meeting and the consequences have become infructuous to be adjudicated and considered in this writ petition. therefore, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. sd/- shaji p.chaly smv judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY THURSDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF JULY 2021 / 10TH ASHADHA, 1943 WP(C) NO. 33453 OF 2016 PETITIONER: NAZAR AGED 45 YEARS,S/O IBRAHIM KUTTY, VEERATHEDUVAZHI HOUSE, PONJANAM DESOM, KATTOOR VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. SRI.N.L.BITTO SRI.M.N.UNNIKRISHNAN RESPONDENTS:

1 THE STATE OF KERALA REP. BY THE SECREETARY TO THE GOVT., LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVT.SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695001. 2 DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATH AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680001. 3 THE KATTOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, KATTOOR MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680001. 4 THE PRESIDENT THE KATTOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, KATTOOR, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680001. 5 RAJALAKSHMI KURUMATH, AGED 45 YEARS, MEMBER OF WARD NO.VI, KATTOOR GRAMAPANCHAYATH, KATTOOR PO, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK,THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680001. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.K.JAGADEESH SRI.T.N.MANOJ SMT.V.RENJU

R1- SRI.SURIN GEORGE IPE,SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER R3 BY SRI.T.N.MANOJ R4 & R5 BY SRI.K.JAGDEESH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.07.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) No.33453/2016 2

JUDGMENT

This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs: a) Call for the records leading to Exhibit P3 and may be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari to quash the same and to direct respondents 3 to 5 to conduct Gramasabha meeting after issuing proper notice. b) To pass any such or further orders as the petitioner may seek and this Hon'ble Court deem fit to grant.

2. The subject issue raised by the petitioner relates to a meeting conducted

on 28.5.2016 by respondents 3 to 5 in ward No.VI of Kattoor Panchayath and the consequential proceedings. Consequent to the election taken place in the year 2020, the Panchayath Committee is not in existence and virtually the subject matter of the decision taken in the meeting and the consequences have become infructuous to be adjudicated and considered in this writ petition. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- SHAJI P.CHALY smv JUDGE

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2021 Same Parties NAZAR vs The State of Kerala Same Judge Honourable Mr. Justice Shaji P.Chaly

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales