Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Navis vs State Rep by

NAVIS vs State Rep by

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Feb 26, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1718802

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
HCP/166/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

NAVIS

Respondent

State Rep by

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated : 26.02.2025coram :the honourable mr. justice m.s. ramesh and the honourable mr. justice n.senthilkumar navis petitioner(s) /husband of the detenue vs1. state rep by the superintendent of police,3.n.l.murugan sekar s/o. not known, k.k.nagar, lakshmi ammal compound, 8th street, bharathi nagar, ganapathy, respondent(s) prayer: petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india to issue a writ of habeas corpus, to the 3rd respondent to produce the petitioner's wife namely pushparani, w/o. navis, aged about 51 years before this hon'ble court and set her at liberty. for petitioner : m/s.s.kalaimani for respondents : mr.s.raja kumar additional public prosecutororderand the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdrawn this petition. he has also made an endorsement to that effect in the court bundle.2. in view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this criminal miscellaneous petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. [m.s.r., j] [n.s., j] index: yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderinternet: yes/no neutral citation: yes/no anu to 1.superintendent of police, 3.the public prosecutor, high court, madras. and anu

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 26.02.2025

CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR NAVIS Petitioner(s) /husband of the detenue Vs

1. State Rep By The Superintendent Of Police,

3.N.L.Murugan Sekar S/o. Not Known, K.K.Nagar, Lakshmi Ammal Compound, 8th Street, Bharathi Nagar, Ganapathy, Respondent(s) PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus, to the 3rd respondent to produce the petitioner's wife namely Pushparani, W/o. Navis, aged about 51 years before this Hon'ble Court and set her at liberty. For Petitioner : M/s.S.Kalaimani For Respondents : Mr.S.Raja Kumar Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

and The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdrawn this petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle.

2. In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. [M.S.R., J] [N.S., J] Index: Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Internet: Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No Anu To 1.Superintendent Of Police, 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. and Anu

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial