Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Selvam vs the State Rep. by Its

Selvam vs The State Rep. by Its

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Feb 07, 2025
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1718046

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/949/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Selvam

Respondent

The State Rep. by Its

Excerpt

.....a copy of the probation officer's report dated 13.01.2025, in which, the probation officer has not recommended for grant of leave since the reasons assigned by the petitioner is said to be false. he would submit that the prisoner is otherwise eligible for 21 days of ordinary leave.5. although the probation officer has not recommend for grant ofleave, considering the fact that the convict prisoner has not availed leave even once, we are inclined to grant ordinary leave for a period of 21 days in exercise of our powers under article 226 of the constitution of india.6. accordingly, the detenue viz., madhankumar, s/o.selvam, aged about 23 years bearing convict no.10426, confined at central prison, puzhal-i, is hereby granted ordinary leave for a period of 21 days,without escort, commencing from 10.00 am on 21.02.2025 to 5 pm of 13.03.2025. on expiry of the ordinary leave, the detenu shall surrender before the prison authorities. during the period of leave, the prisoner shall report before the inspector of police, m-3 puzhal police station, chennai, daily at 05.00 p.m. the convict prisoner shall utilize the leave only for the ground on which it has been granted and shall not indulge in any other activities.7. accordingly, the writ petition stands allowed. no costs. consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. [m.s.r., j] [n.s., j] 07.02.2025 index: yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderinternet: yes/no neutral citation: yes/no anu note: issue order copy on 20.02.2024 upload the order copy forthwith to 1.the deputy inspector general of prison, gandhi irwin road, egmore, chennai-600 008 2.the superintendent, puzhal central prison-i, puzhal-600 066. 3.the inspector of police, m-3 puzhal police station, chennai 4.the public prosecutor, high court, madras.m.s.ramesh, j.andn.senthilkumar, j.anu and w.m.p.no.1151 of 2025 07.02.2025

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 07.02.2025

CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR and W.M.P.No.1151 of 2025 Selvam ...Petitioner/ father of the detenue Vs. The State represented by its, 1.The Deputy Inspector General of Prison, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai-600 008 2.The Superintendent, Puzhal Central Prison-I, Puzhal-600 066. ... Respondents

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records connected with impugned order in proceeding No.611846/Thaku2/2024 dated 30.12.2024 passed by the second respondent and quash the same and direct the respondents to grant ordinary leave for 30 days without escort to the detenue, Madhankumar, S/o.Selvam, aged about 23 years bearing Convict No.10426, confined at Central prison, Puzhal-I.

For Petitioner : Ms.S.Sadhana For Respondent : Mr.R.Muniyapparaj Additional Public Prosecutor assisted by Mr.M.Sylvester John

ORDER

M.S.RAMESH, J.

and

N.SENTHILKUMAR, J.

This writ petition has been filed to call for records connected with impugned order in proceeding No.611846/Thaku2/2024 dated 30.12.2024, passed by the second respondent and quash the same and direct the respondents to grant ordinary leave for 30 days, without escort to the detenue, Madhankumar, S/o.Selvam, aged about 23 years bearing Convict No.10426, confined at Central prison, Puzhal-I.

2. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the documents.

3. The petitioner herein seeks for grant of 30 days of ordinary leave for his son, without escort, on the ground that the petitioner has

certain medical ailments and the doctor has advised him to undergo heart surgery and requires the presence of his son for arranging funds for the same. Further, the detenue has undergone 2 years 4 months and 1 day of imprisonment.

4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor produced a copy of the Probation Officer's report dated 13.01.2025, in which, the Probation Officer has not recommended for grant of leave since the reasons assigned by the petitioner is said to be false. He would submit that the prisoner is otherwise eligible for 21 days of ordinary leave.

5. Although the Probation Officer has not recommend for grant of

leave, considering the fact that the convict prisoner has not availed leave even once, we are inclined to grant ordinary leave for a period of 21 days in exercise of our powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

6. Accordingly, the detenue viz., Madhankumar, S/o.Selvam, aged about 23 years bearing Convict No.10426, confined at Central prison, Puzhal-I, is hereby granted ordinary leave for a period of 21 days,

without escort, commencing from 10.00 am on 21.02.2025 to 5 pm of 13.03.2025. On expiry of the ordinary leave, the detenu shall surrender before the prison authorities. During the period of leave, the prisoner shall report before the Inspector of Police, M-3 Puzhal Police Station, Chennai, daily at 05.00 p.m. The Convict Prisoner shall utilize the leave only for the ground on which it has been granted and shall not indulge in any other activities.

7. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands allowed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. [M.S.R., J] [N.S., J] 07.02.2025 Index: Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Internet: Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No Anu Note: Issue Order Copy on 20.02.2024 Upload the order copy forthwith To 1.The Deputy Inspector General of Prison, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai-600 008 2.The Superintendent, Puzhal Central Prison-I, Puzhal-600 066. 3.The Inspector of Police, M-3 Puzhal Police Station, Chennai 4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

M.S.RAMESH, J.

and

N.SENTHILKUMAR, J.

Anu and W.M.P.No.1151 of 2025 07.02.2025

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial