Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Prajith vs State of Kerala

Prajith vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jan 04, 2021
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1715702

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./8975/2020

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Prajith

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

..... issubmitted that the 2nd accused who is similarly placed had been granted bail by this court videorder dated 22.12.2020 in ba no.8342/2020.3. the applicants state that apart from thiscrime they are not involved in any other crime. considering the fact that they have been subjected to custodial interrogation, nothing more is to be recovered from them and hence they may be released on bail.4. heard the learned counsel for the applicants and the learned public prosecutor.5. the applicants admittedly do not have anycriminal antecedents apart from involvement in this crime. they have been in custody since 12.11.2020. it is true that the offence ofcounterfeit in currencies is a very grave offence and it definitely affects the economy of our country. however, the applicants were found to be in possession of only a few currencies and it was allegedly collected from the 6th accused. the applicants had no other criminal antecedents and therefore, i find that further incarceration of the applicants may not be necessary for the purpose of investigation. stringent conditions are to be imposed.6. in the result, the bail application is allowed and the applicants are directed to bereleased on bail on execution of bond for rs.50,000/- (rupees fifty thousand only) each with two solvent sureties for the like amount each to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional court and on the following conditions;(1) they shall appear before the investigating officer on all saturdays between 9 a.m and 12 noon for a period of two months or till filing of the final report whichever is earlier.(2) they shall surrender their passports, and if they do not have any passport, file an affidavit to that effect.(3) they shall not attempt to influence or intimidate the witnesses.(4) they shall not get involved in similaroffences during the currency of the bail. in the event of violating the bail conditions,.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON MONDAY, THE 04TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 14TH POUSHA, 1942 CRIME NO.1003/2020 OF Alathur Police Station, Palakkad PETITIONER/S: 1 PRAJITH AGED 24 YEARS SON OF KANNAN, KARAKKADU VEEDU, VENNUR, ELANAD, THRISSUR. 2 HARIDAS AGED 21 YEARS SON OF KANNAN, THEKKUMPADAM VEEDU, THENNILAPURAM, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.V.A.JOHNSON (VARIKKAPPALLIL) RESPONDENT/S: STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.SANTHOSH PETER SR PP THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

Dated this the 4th day of January 2021 Application for regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The applicants are accused Nos.3 and 5 in Crime No.1003/2020 of Alathur Police Station, Palakkad, for having allegedly committed offences punishable under Sections 489B and 489C r/w Section 34 of the IPC.

2. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 11.11.2020 at about 6.30 p.m, the accused persons

were found to be in possession of counterfeit currencies of Rs.500/- denomination, knowingly the same to be counterfeit, in furtherance of common intention with a person named Malik, who the 6 th accused from whom the applicants had collected the counterfeit currencies for the purpose of distribution and thus they committed the offence. Both these accused were arrested on 12.11.2020 and remanded to judicial custody. The applications for

bail    before    the      Sessions        court,          Palakkad       were
dismissed     and       therefore              the        applicants      had
approached       this      Court         for    indulgence.          It    is

submitted that the 2nd accused who is similarly placed had been granted bail by this Court vide

order dated 22.12.2020 in BA No.8342/2020.

3. The applicants state that apart from this

crime they are not involved in any other crime. Considering the fact that they have been subjected to custodial interrogation, nothing more is to be recovered from them and hence they may be released on bail.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the applicants and the learned Public Prosecutor.

5. The applicants admittedly do not have any

criminal    antecedents         apart          from       involvement      in
this    crime.      They      have       been        in    custody     since
12.11.2020.      It     is     true        that       the     offence      of

counterfeit in currencies is a very grave offence and it definitely affects the economy of our country. However, the applicants were found to be in possession of only a few currencies and it was allegedly collected from the 6th accused. The applicants had no other criminal antecedents and therefore, I find that further incarceration of the applicants may not be necessary for the purpose of investigation. Stringent conditions are to be imposed.

6. In the result, the bail application is allowed and the applicants are directed to be

released on bail on execution of bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty thousand only) each with two solvent sureties for the like amount each to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional court and on the following conditions;

(1) They shall appear before the investigating officer on all Saturdays between 9 a.m and 12 noon for a period of two months or till filing of the final report whichever is earlier.

(2) They shall surrender their passports, and if they do not have any passport, file an affidavit to that effect.

(3) They shall not attempt to influence or intimidate the witnesses.

(4) They shall not get involved in similar

offences during the currency of the bail. In the event of violating the bail conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to apply for cancellation of bail before the jurisdictional court. Sd/- ASHOK MENON JUDGE SPK

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial