Gurappa vs State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Jul 02, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1712582

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1712582
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: E.S.Indiresh
Decided On: Jul 02, 2025
Case Number: WP/13908/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Gurappa

Respondent

State of Karnataka

Excerpt

.....veedhi chaya location: high bengaluru -560 001. court of karnataka 2. the tahsildar also secretary of ruc committee doddaballapura taluk3. the chairman land grant committee for unauthorised occupation taluk -2- …respondents (by smt. navya shekar, aga) this writ petition is filed under articles 226and 227 of the constitution of india praying to direct to respondents no.2 and 3 for consider the annexure-a dated 24.11.1996, the application filed by the petitioner in form no.53, in respect of sy.no.32, measuring 5 guntas of karanala village, tubagere hobli, doddaballapura taluk. this petition, coming on for orders, this day,order was made therein as under:coram: hon'ble mr. justice e.s.indireshoral order1. this writ petition is filed by the petitioner praying todirect respondent nos.2 and 3 to consider the application filed by the petitioner dated 24.11.1996 in form-53, in respect of the subject land, as per annexure-a.2. learned additional government advocate submitted thatthe application filed by the petitioner in form-53 has been rejected by the respondent - authorities. in support of her contention, learned additional government advocate has filed a -3- memo with documents. learned additional government advocate further submitted that the petition may be dismissed has having become infructuous, in view of rejection of petitioner's application in form-53, as per the memo dated 02.07.2025.3. in view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed. however, it is open for the petitioner to take recourse to law, in a manner known to law. sd/- (e.s.indiresh) judge sac list no.: 1 sl no.: 31

Full Judgment

-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.13908 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
1. GURAPPA
S/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS R/AT SUNNAGHATAHALLI VILLAGE, TUBAGARE HOBLI, DODDABALLAPURA TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-561205. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. CHOKKAREDDY., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA

UNDER SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT Digitally signed by M.S. BUILDING SHARMA ANAND AMBEDKAR VEEDHI CHAYA Location: HIGH BENGALURU -560 001. COURT OF KARNATAKA 2. THE TAHSILDAR ALSO SECRETARY OF RUC COMMITTEE DODDABALLAPURA TALUK

3. THE CHAIRMAN LAND GRANT COMMITTEE FOR UNAUTHORISED OCCUPATION TALUK -2- …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKAR, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226

AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT TO RESPONDENTS NO.2 AND 3 FOR CONSIDER THE ANNEXURE-A DATED 24.11.1996, THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER IN FORM NO.53, IN RESPECT OF SY.NO.32, MEASURING 5 GUNTAS OF KARANALA VILLAGE, TUBAGERE HOBLI, DODDABALLAPURA TALUK. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH

ORAL ORDER

1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner praying to

direct respondent Nos.2 and 3 to consider the application filed by the petitioner dated 24.11.1996 in Form-53, in respect of the subject land, as per Annexure-A.

2. Learned Additional Government Advocate submitted that

the application filed by the petitioner in Form-53 has been rejected by the respondent - authorities. In support of her contention, learned Additional Government Advocate has filed a -3- memo with documents. Learned Additional Government Advocate further submitted that the petition may be dismissed has having become infructuous, in view of rejection of petitioner's application in Form-53, as per the memo dated 02.07.2025.

3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed. However, it is open for the petitioner to take recourse to law, in a manner known to law. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2025 Same Parties Gurappa vs State of Karnataka Same Judge E.S.Indiresh