Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

C.Eswaran vs M.Subbarayan

C.Eswaran vs M.Subbarayan

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Nov 27, 2025
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1712408

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL RC/109/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

C.Eswaran

Respondent

M.Subbarayan

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 27.11.2025coram:the honourable mrs. justice t.v.thamilselvi c. eswaran .. petitioner vs m. subbarayan .. respondent civil revision petition is filed under section 397 and 401 of cr.p.c., to set aside the judgment of the learned principal sessions judge, tiruppur, in c.a. no. 35 of 2021 dated 01.12.2023 confirming the conviction and sentence passed by the learned fast track court at magisterial level, tiruppur in c.c. no.69 of 2015 dated 15.04.2021. for petitioner : mr. j. franklin for respondent : mr. v. logeshorderwhen the matter is taken up for hearing, a memo of compromise dated 27.11.2025, signed by the parties and duly attested by their respective counsel, was produced before the court.2. since the matter has been amicably settled between the parties, thememo of compromise is taken on record. accordingly, the criminal revision case is disposed of and the terms of the compromise shall form part and parcel of this order. index :yes/no neutral citation :yes/no at to 1.the principal sessions judge, tiruppur. 2.the fast track court at magisterial level, tiruppur.t.v.thamilselvi, j.at

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 27.11.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE Mrs. JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI C. Eswaran .. Petitioner Vs M. Subbarayan .. Respondent Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C., to set aside the judgment of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruppur, in C.A. No. 35 of 2021 dated 01.12.2023 confirming the conviction and sentence passed by the learned Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Tiruppur in C.C. No.69 of 2015 dated 15.04.2021. For Petitioner : Mr. J. Franklin For Respondent : Mr. V. Logesh

ORDER

When the matter is taken up for hearing, a memo of compromise dated 27.11.2025, signed by the parties and duly attested by their respective counsel, was produced before the Court.

2. Since the matter has been amicably settled between the parties, the

memo of compromise is taken on record. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of and the terms of the compromise shall form part and parcel of this order. Index :Yes/No Neutral Citation :Yes/No AT To 1.The Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruppur. 2.The Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Tiruppur.

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

AT

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial