K.Sudha vs the State by

K.Sudha vs The State by

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Jul 30, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1712279

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1712279
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: J.M.Khazi
Decided On: Jul 30, 2025
Case Number: CRL.P/7033/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

K.Sudha

Respondent

The State by

Excerpt

.....560204. karnataka aadhar no. 859831736404 …petitioners (by sri. shaikh soud, advocate) and:1. the state by byadarahalli police station represented by -2- the state public prosecutor high court of karnataka bengaluru- 5600012. geetha j d d/o p.s. jayram rao shinde, senior health inspector house no.82/1, near house of e.b. shinde hosamane extention, chikkamagaluru-577101 …respondents (by sri.vinay mahadevaiah, hcgp) this crl.p is filed u/s.482 cr.p.c by the advocatefor the petitioner praying to quash the proceedings against the petitioner of cr.no.179/2023 u/s.498-a of ipc and sec.3 and 4 of dp act, of the byadarahalli p.s., pending on the file of the chief judicial magistrate(cjm) court bengaluru rural district bengaluru and allowed. this petition, coming on for orders, this day,order was made therein as under:coram: hon'ble ms. justice j.m.khazioral orderlearned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo stating that respondent no.1 has filed the charge sheet and prays for dismissal of the petition as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh petition.2. the aforesaid memo is placed on record. -3-3. in the light of the memo, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh petition, if so permissible under law.4. in view of disposal of petition, pending application/s, if any, stands disposed off, as no separateorder is required.sd/- (j.m.khazi) judge asn list no.: 1 sl no.: 13

Full Judgment

-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 7033 OF 2023 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN:
1. K.SUDHA
W/O RAMAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 69, NO.161-24, SOUNDARYA NILAYA, 2ND CROSS, ANDRAHALLI MAIN ROAD, HEROHALLI, VISHWANIDHAM, BENGALURU NORTH, KARNATAKA-560091 AADHAR NO. 361879653741
2. R. PRATHIBHA W/O RAMESH G. S. AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, Digitally
signed by          NO.1853, 5TH A MAIN,
REKHA R            R.P.C. LAYOUT VIJAYANAGAR
Location:          2ND STAGE, BENGALURU NORTH,
High Court of HAMPINAGAR, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA- 560204. Karnataka AADHAR NO. 859831736404 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHAIKH SOUD, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE STATE BY BYADARAHALLI POLICE STATION REPRESENTED BY -2- THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU- 560001
2. GEETHA J D D/O P.S. JAYRAM RAO SHINDE, SENIOR HEALTH INSPECTOR HOUSE NO.82/1, NEAR HOUSE OF E.B. SHINDE HOSAMANE EXTENTION, CHIKKAMAGALURU-577101 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.VINAY MAHADEVAIAH, HCGP) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE
FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE PETITIONER OF CR.NO.179/2023 U/S.498-A OF IPC AND SEC.3 AND 4 OF DP ACT, OF THE BYADARAHALLI P.S., PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
(CJM) COURT BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT BENGALURU AND ALLOWED. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI

ORAL ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo stating that respondent No.1 has filed the charge sheet and prays for dismissal of the petition as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh petition.

2. The aforesaid memo is placed on record. -3-

3. In the light of the memo, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh petition, if so permissible under law.

4. In view of disposal of petition, pending application/s, if any, stands disposed off, as no separate

order is required.

Sd/- (J.M.KHAZI) JUDGE ASN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2025 Same Parties K.Sudha vs The State by Same Judge J.M.Khazi