Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

S.Pandiyan Vs The State Rep by its

S.Pandiyan vs The State Rep by its

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jan 31, 2025
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1711398

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL MP/1336/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

S.Pandiyan

Respondent

The State Rep by its

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated : 31.01.2025coramthe hon'ble mr. justice p.dhanabal s.pandiyan ... petitioner vs. state represented by, the inspector of police, crime no.268 of 2024. ... respondent for petitioner : mr.s.p.harikrishnan for respondent : mr.s.balaji government advocate (crl.side)orderthis petition has been filed to relax the condition in para no.3 imposed on the petitioner that “the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police on every saturday at 6.30 p.m., until further orders” passed in crl.mp.no.16723 of 2024 in crl.op.no.25579 of 2024 dated 28.11.2024.2. the learned government advocate (crl.side) would submit that the petitioner is complying with the conditions regularly, and further, the investigation was also completed.3. considering the representation made by both side counsel,nature of offence, investigation was already completed, and that the petitioner is complying with the conditions without fail, this court is inclined to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in toto. accordingly, this criminal miscellaneous petition is ordered. drl to 1.the inspector of police, 2.the public prosecutor, high court, madras.p.dhanabal, j.drl

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 31.01.2025

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.DHANABAL S.Pandiyan ... Petitioner Vs. State Represented by, The Inspector of Police, Crime No.268 of 2024. ... Respondent For Petitioner : Mr.S.P.Harikrishnan For Respondent : Mr.S.Balaji Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

This petition has been filed to relax the condition in para no.3 imposed on the petitioner that “the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police on every Saturday at 6.30 p.m., until further orders” passed in Crl.MP.No.16723 of 2024 in Crl.OP.No.25579 of 2024 dated 28.11.2024.

2. The Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that the petitioner is complying with the conditions regularly, and further, the investigation was also completed.

3. Considering the representation made by both side counsel,

nature of offence, investigation was already completed, and that the petitioner is complying with the conditions without fail, this Court is inclined to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in toto. Accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is ordered. drl To 1.The Inspector of Police, 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

P.DHANABAL, J.

drl

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial