Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

K.V.Krishnakumar vs the Director

K.V.Krishnakumar vs The Director

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Nov 30, 2021
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1708155

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/27116/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

K.V.Krishnakumar

Respondent

The Director

Excerpt

.....for admission on 30.11.2021, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentthis writ petition is filed seeking directions to the 2nd respondent to verify exts.p1 and p1(a) applications and to grant permission to remit the prescribed fee as contemplated in rule 6(2)(a) of the kerala minerals (prevention of illegal mining, storage and transportation) rules 2015. the petitioner also seeks an expeditious consideration of the applications, in accordance with law, after conduct of all due inspections.2. having heard the learned government pleader also, there will bea direction to the 2nd respondent to take up exts.p1 and p1(a) applications and to consider and pass orders on the same in accordance with law. the petitioner shall be permitted to remit the required fees and appropriate inspections shall be carried out before final orders are passed as directed above. appropriate orders shall be passed within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. this writ petition is ordered accordingly. sd/- anu sivaraman judge np appendix of wp(c) 27116/2021 petitioner's exhibits: exhibit p1 a true copy of the application submitted in form a dated 22.09.2021. exhibit p1a a true copy of the application submitted in form a dated 22.11.2021. exhibit p2 a true copy of the representation to 1st respondent dated 22.09.2021. respondents' exhibits: nil

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN TUESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 9TH AGRAHAYANA, 1943 PETITIONER: K.V.KRISHNAKUMAR AGED 64 YEARS S/O. K. K. VASUDEVAPANIKAR, RESIDING AT 28/886 "HARITHA" PANDARAKADAVU, KUNNATHURMEDU P. O., PALAKKAD - 678013. BY ADVS. P.M.MANOJ S.RUSSEL RESPONDENTS: 1 THE DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF MINING AND GEOLOGY, KESAVADASAPURAM, PATTOM PALACE P. O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 004. 2 THE GEOLOGIST DISTRICT OFFICE, DEPARTMENT OF MINING & GEOLOGY, MUNICIPAL SHOPPING COMPLEX, T. B. ROAD, PALAKKAD - 678014. SRI.RIYAL DEVASSY, GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30.11.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

This writ petition is filed seeking directions to the 2nd respondent to verify Exts.P1 and P1(a) applications and to grant permission to remit the prescribed fee as contemplated in Rule 6(2)(a) of the Kerala Minerals (Prevention of Illegal Mining, Storage and Transportation) Rules 2015. The petitioner also seeks an expeditious consideration of the applications, in accordance with law, after conduct of all due inspections.

2. Having heard the learned Government Pleader also, there will be

a direction to the 2nd respondent to take up Exts.P1 and P1(a) applications and to consider and pass orders on the same in accordance with law. The petitioner shall be permitted to remit the required fees and appropriate inspections shall be carried out before final orders are passed as directed above. Appropriate orders shall be passed within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. This writ petition is ordered accordingly. Sd/- ANU SIVARAMAN JUDGE NP APPENDIX OF WP(C) 27116/2021 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED IN FORM A DATED 22.09.2021. Exhibit P1A A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED IN FORM A DATED 22.11.2021. Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION TO 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 22.09.2021. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2021 Same Parties K.V.Krishnakumar vs The Director Same Judge Honourable Mrs. Justice Anu Sivaraman

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales