Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Saalim Ashref, vs the State of Kerala

Saalim Ashref, vs The State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Feb 01, 2021
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1706514

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/26898/2020

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Saalim Ashref,

Respondent

The State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice anil k.narendran monday, the 01st day of february 2021 / 12th magha,1942 petitioner/s: saalim ashref, aged 32 years s/o. ashraf, residing at saalim manzil, ex.servicemen colony p.o, jawahar colony, palode, peringamala village, nedumangadu taluk, thiruvananthapuram district, pin - 695562. by advs. sri.j.r.prem navaz shri.sumeen s. respondent/s:1 the state of kerala represented by its secretary, department of home affairs, thiruvananthapuram, pin - 695001. 2 the superintendent of police, thiruvananthapuram rural, thiruvananthapuram district. 3 the deputy superintendent of police, nedumangad, office at nedumangad town road, pazhavadi, nedumangad, thiruvananthapuram district, pin - 695541. 4 station house officer, palode police station, nedumangad taluk, thiruvananthapuram district.other present: smt vidhya a.c-government pleader this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 01.02.2021, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentthe petitioner, has filed this writ petition under article 226 of the constitution of india, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the 4th respondent station house officer not to harass him unnecessarily.2. on 04.12.2020, when this writ petition came up for admission, the learned government pleader was directed to get instructions.3. today, when this writ petition is taken up forconsideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition, since the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this matter further. recording the above said submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. sd/- anil k. narendran judge min

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN MONDAY, THE 01ST DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 12TH MAGHA,1942 PETITIONER/S: SAALIM ASHREF, AGED 32 YEARS S/O. ASHRAF, RESIDING AT SAALIM MANZIL, EX.SERVICEMEN COLONY P.O, JAWAHAR COLONY, PALODE, PERINGAMALA VILLAGE, NEDUMANGADU TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 695562. BY ADVS. SRI.J.R.PREM NAVAZ SHRI.SUMEEN S. RESPONDENT/S:

1 THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001. 2 THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM RURAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 3 THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NEDUMANGAD, OFFICE AT NEDUMANGAD TOWN ROAD, PAZHAVADI, NEDUMANGAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 695541. 4 STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PALODE POLICE STATION, NEDUMANGAD TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.

OTHER PRESENT: SMT VIDHYA A.C-GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

The petitioner, has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the 4th respondent Station House Officer not to harass him unnecessarily.

2. On 04.12.2020, when this writ petition came up for admission, the learned Government Pleader was directed to get instructions.

3. Today, when this writ petition is taken up for

consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition, since the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this matter further. Recording the above said submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- ANIL K. NARENDRAN JUDGE MIN

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial