Sri Krishnamurthy vs State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Sep 01, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1706173

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1706173
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: M.Nagaprasanna
Decided On: Sep 01, 2025
Case Number: CRP/335/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sri Krishnamurthy

Respondent

State of Karnataka

Excerpt

.....post gubbi taluk tumkuru district 572216.5. anjaneyaswamy devesthanaseegenahalli village chelur hobli tumkur district-572213 represented by tahsildar gubbi taluk. …respondents this crp is filed under sec.115 of cpc., praying to call for records in order dated 08.06.1988, in appeal no.bu:su:pa:may no.148/86 passed by the respondent no.2 produced at annexure-a. set aside the order dated 08.06.1988, in appeal no:bu:su:pa:may no.148/86 passed by the respondent no.2 produced at annexure-a and to modify the order dated 23.04.1982 in lrmiha (ch)no.136, 140, 846/80-81 passed by the respondent no.3 annexure-b as per the schedule property & etc., this petition, coming on for admission, this day,order was made therein as under:-3- coram: hon'ble mr. justice m.nagaprasannaoral orderlearned counsel for the petitioner filed a memo seeking to withdraw the petition.2. memo reads as under:"the petitioner submits as follows: that petitioner respectfully prays before this hon'ble court may kindly pleased to permit the petitioner to withdraw the above petition, with liberty to proceed as accordance with law and kindly direct the office to return the certified copies of documents, in the interest of justice and equity."3. memo is placed on record.4. in the light of the said memo, writ petition is disposed as withdrawn.5. the originals appended to the petition shall be returned to the petitioner, by retaining a photocopy of the same, forthwith by the registry. sd/- (m.nagaprasanna) judge bsr/list no.: 1 sl no.: 74

Full Judgment

-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.335/2025 BETWEEN: SRI. KRISHNAMURTHY S/O LAKSHMINARASIMHAIAH AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS Digitally signed R/AT SEEGENAHALLI VILLAGE by NAGAVENI CHELUR HOBLI, Location: HIGH COURT OF GUBBI TALUK KARNATAKA TUMKUR DISTRICT-572216. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KUMARA K.G. ADV.,) AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560001 REP. BY ITS SECRETARY.
2. THE DISTRICT LAND REFORMS APPELLATE AUTHORITY TUMKUR DISTRICT, TUMKUR-572106.
3. THE LAND TRIBUNAL-LAND REFORMS TUMKUR DISTRICT-572216. -2-
4. SRI. SESHAGIRI RAO S/O LATE SHANKAR NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 61YEARS R/AT. CHELUR VILLAGE AND POST GUBBI TALUK TUMKURU DISTRICT 572216.
5. ANJANEYASWAMY DEVESTHANA
SEEGENAHALLI VILLAGE CHELUR HOBLI TUMKUR DISTRICT-572213 REPRESENTED BY TAHSILDAR GUBBI TALUK. …RESPONDENTS THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SEC.115 OF CPC., PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS IN ORDER DATED 08.06.1988, IN APPEAL NO.BU:SU:PA:MAY NO.148/86 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A. SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 08.06.1988, IN APPEAL NO:BU:SU:PA:MAY NO.148/86 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A AND TO MODIFY THE ORDER DATED 23.04.1982 IN LRMIHA (CH)NO.136, 140, 846/80-81 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3 ANNEXURE-B AS PER THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY & ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

-3- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

ORAL ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioner filed a memo seeking to withdraw the petition.

2. Memo reads as under:

"The petitioner submits as follows: That petitioner respectfully prays before this Hon'ble Court may kindly pleased to permit the petitioner to withdraw the above petition, with liberty to proceed as accordance with law and kindly direct the office to return the certified copies of documents, in the interest of justice and equity."

3. Memo is placed on record.

4. In the light of the said memo, writ petition is disposed as withdrawn.

5. The originals appended to the petition shall be returned to the petitioner, by retaining a photocopy of the same, forthwith by the Registry. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE BSR/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 74

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2025 Same Parties Sri Krishnamurthy vs State of Karnataka Same Judge M.Nagaprasanna