Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sandeep Kumar, vs Greeshma,

Sandeep Kumar, vs Greeshma,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Feb 24, 2021
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1703311

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Mat.Appeal/44/2019

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sandeep Kumar,

Respondent

Greeshma,

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice a.muhamed mustaque & the honourable mr.justice c.s.dias wednesday, the 24th day of february 2021 / 5th phalguna, against the order/judgment in op 70/2016 dated 14-06-2018 of family court,thrissur appellants: 1 sandeep kumar, s/o p.b. sathian, m.m. garden, pandeswar, mangaluru, 575 003, represented by the power of attorney holder, santhosh kumar, s/o p.b. sathian, aged 32 years, m.m. garden, 2 p.b. sathian, aged 65 years, m.m. garden, 3 dhanalakshmi, aged 60 years, w/o sathian, m.m. garden, pandeswar, mangaluru, 575 003. by adv. sri.binoy vasudevan respondent: greeshma, aged 24 years, d/o m.a. krishna mani, paramel pady street, kondazhy village, talappilly taluk, thrissur district-679 106. r1 by adv. sri.rajit this matrimonial appeal having been finally heard on 24.02.2021, the court on the same day delivered the following: ..2..judgmentdated this the 24th day of february 2021 a.muhamed mustaque, j the learned counsel for the appellant submitsthat the matter has been settled out of court. in view of the above, he is not pressing the mat. appeal. accordingly, the mat. appeal is dismissedas not pressed. all pending interlocutory applications, if any, are closed. a.muhamed mustaque c.s.dias pr

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 5TH PHALGUNA, AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OP 70/2016 DATED 14-06-2018 OF FAMILY COURT,THRISSUR APPELLANTS: 1 SANDEEP KUMAR, S/O P.B. SATHIAN, M.M. GARDEN, PANDESWAR, MANGALURU, 575 003, REPRESENTED BY THE POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, SANTHOSH KUMAR, S/O P.B. SATHIAN, AGED 32 YEARS, M.M. GARDEN, 2 P.B. SATHIAN, AGED 65 YEARS, M.M. GARDEN, 3 DHANALAKSHMI, AGED 60 YEARS, W/O SATHIAN, M.M. GARDEN, PANDESWAR, MANGALURU, 575 003. BY ADV. SRI.BINOY VASUDEVAN RESPONDENT: GREESHMA, AGED 24 YEARS, D/O M.A. KRISHNA MANI, PARAMEL PADY STREET, KONDAZHY VILLAGE, TALAPPILLY TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT-679 106. R1 BY ADV. SRI.RAJIT THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ..2..

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 24th day of February 2021 A.Muhamed Mustaque, J The learned counsel for the appellant submits

that the matter has been settled out of Court.                    In
view    of   the   above,   he    is     not   pressing   the   Mat.
Appeal.      Accordingly, the Mat. Appeal is dismissed

as not pressed. All pending interlocutory applications, if any, are closed. A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE C.S.DIAS PR

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial