Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Pushparaj vs Somasundaram

Pushparaj vs Somasundaram

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Nov 28, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1702624

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL RC/226/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Pushparaj

Respondent

Somasundaram

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 28-11-2025coramthe honourable mrs.justice t.v.thamilselvi and crl.m.p.nos.1939 & 1941 of 20241. pushparaj s/o.kandasamy, nadu street, nanjai idayar, paramathy velur taluk, namakkal district. petitioner(s) vs1. somasundaramrespondent(s) prayer criminal revision case filed under section 397 r/w 401 of code of criminal procedure, prays to call for records relating to the order of the principal sessions judge, namakkal in c.a.no.99 of 2022 dated 25.08.2023 confirming the order of the judicial magistrate, paramathi in stc.no.917 of 2017 dated 15.11.2022. for petitioner(s): m/s.r.rajesh for respondent(s): mr.c.prabakaranordertoday, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent would state that pending this revision, the petitioner and the respondent have settled the issue before the mediation. the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent have filed a memorandum of compromise dated 21.11.2025, duly signed by the parties and their respective counsel.2. the learned counsel appearing for both sides submitted that the criminal revision may be disposed of in terms of the memorandum of compromise.3. the memorandum of compromise filed by the parties dated21.11.2025 is taken on record. accordingly, this criminal revision case is disposed of in terms of the memorandum of compromise filed by the parties. the memorandum of compromise dated 21.11.2025 shall form part of theorder.4. since, the matter has been settled, the complaint given by the defacto complainant is dismissed as settled and the accused is acquitted.5. accordingly, this criminal revision case is disposed of. index:yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderrri to 1.somasundaram2. the judicial magistrate, paramathi. t.v.thamilselvi j. rri

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 28-11-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI and Crl.M.P.Nos.1939 & 1941 of 2024

1. Pushparaj S/o.Kandasamy, Nadu Street, Nanjai Idayar, Paramathy Velur Taluk, Namakkal District. Petitioner(s) Vs

1. Somasundaram

Respondent(s) PRAYER Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of Code of Criminal Procedure, prays to call for records relating to the order of the Principal Sessions Judge, Namakkal in C.A.No.99 of 2022 dated 25.08.2023 confirming the order of the Judicial Magistrate, Paramathi in STC.No.917 of 2017 dated 15.11.2022. For Petitioner(s): M/s.R.Rajesh For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Prabakaran

ORDER

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent would state that pending this revision, the petitioner and the respondent have settled the issue before the Mediation. The learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent have filed a Memorandum of Compromise dated 21.11.2025, duly signed by the parties and their respective counsel.

2. The learned counsel appearing for both sides submitted that the Criminal revision may be disposed of in terms of the Memorandum of Compromise.

3. The Memorandum of Compromise filed by the parties dated

21.11.2025 is taken on record. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case is disposed of in terms of the Memorandum of Compromise filed by the parties. The Memorandum of Compromise dated 21.11.2025 shall form part of the

order.

4. Since, the matter has been settled, the complaint given by the defacto complainant is dismissed as settled and the accused is acquitted.

5. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case is disposed of. Index:Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

rri To 1.Somasundaram

2. The Judicial Magistrate, Paramathi. T.V.THAMILSELVI J. rri

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial