Sri. Anil Kumar vs the State

Sri. Anil Kumar vs The State

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Apr 28, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1702352

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1702352
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: S Vishwajith Shetty
Decided On: Apr 28, 2025
Case Number: CRL.P/5988/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sri. Anil Kumar

Respondent

The State

Excerpt

.....state public prosecutor high court bengaluru - 560 001. …respondent (by smt. pushpalatha b, addl. spp) this crl.p is filed u/s 438 cr.pc (filed u/s 482 bnss) praying to pass an order enlarging the petitioners on anticipatory bail in the event of their apprehension of arrest by the respondent police, in the complaint filed by the complainant in cr.no.16/2025 u/s 115(2), 118(1), 352, -2-351(3), 3(5) of bns, 2023 on the file of principal civil judge (sr.dn.) and cjm court, chickballapura district, chickballapura, on such terms and conditions as this honble court may deem fit.this petition, coming on for orders, this day, orderwas made therein as under: coram: hon'ble mr justice s vishwajith shettyoral order1. learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing thematter for some time submits that petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the petitioner to surrender before the jurisdictional sessions court and file necessary application seeking regular bail. he submits that considering the background in which the incident in question has taken place, the said court may be directed to consider and dispose of the application seeking regular bail expeditiously.2. the submission of learned counsel is placed on record.3. petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as prayedfor. in the event, petitioner surrenders before the jurisdictional court and files necessary application seeking regular bail, the -3- said court shall consider the said application on its merits and dispose of the same as expeditiously as possible.4. all contentions urged are left open. sd/- (s vishwajith shetty) judge dn

Full Judgment

-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 5988 OF 2025 BETWEEN:
1. SRI ANIL KUMAR
S/O LATE LAKSHMAN A B AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS R/AT GUNTHAPPANAHALLI ROAD NEAR SRI SAI INTERIOR FACTORY HONNENAHALLI VILLAGE AVALAGURKI PANCHAYATH CHICKBALLAPUR TALUK DISTRICT.
2. SRI SUNIL KUMAR S/O LATE LAKSHMANNA B AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS R/AT 2ND CROSS, WARD NO.21 CHICKBALLAPUR TOWN. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI RAVINDRANATH K, ADV.) Digitally signed AND: by NANDINI D Location: HIGH THE STATE BY CHICKBALLAPUR COURT OF KARNATAKA TOWN POLICE STATION
REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BENGALURU - 560 001. …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. PUSHPALATHA B, ADDL. SPP) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 438 CR.PC (FILED U/S 482 BNSS) PRAYING TO PASS AN ORDER ENLARGING THE PETITIONERS ON ANTICIPATORY BAIL IN THE EVENT OF THEIR APPREHENSION OF ARREST BY THE RESPONDENT POLICE, IN THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE COMPLAINANT IN CR.NO.16/2025 U/S 115(2), 118(1), 352, -2-
351(3), 3(5) OF BNS, 2023 ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN.) AND CJM COURT, CHICKBALLAPURA DISTRICT, CHICKBALLAPURA, ON SUCH TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS THIS HONBLE COURT MAY DEEM FIT.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER

WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY

ORAL ORDER

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing the

matter for some time submits that petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the petitioner to surrender before the jurisdictional Sessions Court and file necessary application seeking regular bail. He submits that considering the background in which the incident in question has taken place, the said Court may be directed to consider and dispose of the application seeking regular bail expeditiously.

2. The submission of learned counsel is placed on record.

3. Petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as prayed

for. In the event, petitioner surrenders before the jurisdictional Court and files necessary application seeking regular bail, the -3- said Court shall consider the said application on its merits and dispose of the same as expeditiously as possible.

4. All contentions urged are left open. Sd/- (S VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE DN

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2025 Same Parties Sri. Anil Kumar vs The State Same Judge S Vishwajith Shetty