Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Mr. Nagaraja vs the State of Karnataka

Mr. Nagaraja vs The State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided May 02, 2025
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1702333

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/13299/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mr. Nagaraja

Respondent

The State of Karnataka

Excerpt

.....respondent - bda.2. learned counsel for the petitioners submits that thepetitioners are the owners of 30.08 guntas of land in sy.nos.12/1 and 12/2 of ramagondanahalli village which is acquired for the purpose of formation of dr.k.shivaramkaranth layout. the petitioners have given a representation at -3- annexure-l dated 08.04.2025 to the 3rd respondent - additional special land acquisition officer seeking allotment of 40% of the developed sites in lieu of compensation. the prayer in the writ petition is to direct the respondents to consider the representation given by the petitioners.3. having regard to the prayer made in the writpetition, the writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the 3rd respondent - additional special land acquisition officer to consider the representation at annexure-l given by the petitioners and pass necessary orders, while also informing the petitioners about the decision taken.4. the entire exercise shall be completed asexpeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. ordered accordingly. sd/- (r devdas) judge ap list no.: 1 sl no.: 19

Full Judgment

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF MAY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 13299 OF 2025 (LA-BDA) BETWEEN:

1. MR. NAGARAJA S/O LATE CHANNARAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,

2. MR. SUNIL KUMAR B., S/O LATE BYRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,

BOTH ARE R/AT NO. 108, RAMAGONDANAHALLI VILLAGE, IVRI ROAD, S N HALLI POST YALAHANKA HOBLI AND TALUK, BANGALORE-560 064. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. R. SRINIVASA GOWDA, ADVOCATE)

Digitally signed by KRISHNAPPA AND: LAXMI YASHODA Location: HIGH 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA COURT OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 5TH FLOOR, M S BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001. REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.

2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD BANGALORE -20 REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER -2-

3. THE ADDL SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BANGALORE-20. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SPOORTHY HEGDE N., HCGP) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-2 AND 3 TO ALLOT DEVELOPED LAND IN LIEU OF MONETARY COMPENSATION BY CONSIDERING THE REPRESENTATIONS DTD. 08.04.2025 FILED BY THE PETITIONERS AS PER ANNX-L. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS

ORAL ORDER

Learned AGA takes notice for respondent No.1. Learned counsel Sri.C.Venkatesh who is present in the Court takes notice for respondents No.2 and 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to serve copies of the writ petition along with annexures on the learned AGA and learned counsel for the respondent - BDA.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

petitioners are the owners of 30.08 guntas of land in Sy.Nos.12/1 and 12/2 of Ramagondanahalli village which is acquired for the purpose of formation of Dr.K.Shivaramkaranth Layout. The petitioners have given a representation at -3- Annexure-L dated 08.04.2025 to the 3rd respondent - Additional Special Land Acquisition Officer seeking allotment of 40% of the developed sites in lieu of compensation. The prayer in the writ petition is to direct the respondents to consider the representation given by the petitioners.

3. Having regard to the prayer made in the writ

petition, the writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the 3rd respondent - Additional Special Land Acquisition Officer to consider the representation at Annexure-L given by the petitioners and pass necessary orders, while also informing the petitioners about the decision taken.

4. The entire exercise shall be completed as

expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE AP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial