Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sri. Bhadresh vs Venkatappa

Sri. Bhadresh vs Venkatappa

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Sep 01, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1701723

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/13305/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sri. Bhadresh

Respondent

Venkatappa

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 1st day of september, 2025 before the hon'ble mr. justice m.nagaprasanna writ petition no. 13305 of 2025 (gm-cpc) between:1. sri. bhadresh s/o m. gangaiah, aged about 40 years2. g rupesh s/o m gangaiah, aged about 36 years, digitally signed …petitioners by nagaveni location: high (by sri. shrirama, advocate) court of karnataka and:1. venkatappa aged about 69 years, resident of gowdaiahnapalaya,2. ramaiah -2- aged about 63 years, r/at gowdaiahnapalaya, kariyanna s/o late mudalagiriyappa3. smt. lakshmamma w/o karianna aged 56 years4. sri. krishnamurthy s/o late karianna5. smt. gowramma aged 51 years6. sri. yuvaraju gowda s/o late krishnamurthy aged 27 years7. lakshmi aged 24 years8. smt. jayamma9. shilpa -3-10. shilpa aged 19 years11. lakshmidevamma aged 41 years12. mangalamma aged 37 years13. nagarahtnamma aged 31 years the respondents 3 to 13 all are residing opposite to shanimathma temple road upparahalli, tumakuru - 572 136.14. m gangaiah aged about 62 years hebbur hobli, tumakuru taluk - 572 120.15. venkataramanappa aged about 60 yrs -4- …respondents (by sri. m.b.chandra chooda, advocate) this w.p. is filed under article 227 of theconstitution of india praying to quash the orderpassed by the honble court of the principal civil judge (senior division) at tumakuru in fdp no. 04/2014 dated 03.12.2024 vide annx-a and etc., this petition, coming on for orders, this day,order was made therein as under:coram: hon'ble mr. justice m.nagaprasannaoral orderthe learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has moved the matter seeking to withdraw the petition. in the light of the said submission, the petition is disposed as withdrawn. sd/- (m.nagaprasanna) judge jy list no.: 5 sl no.: 3/ct: bhk

Full Judgment

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 13305 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:

1. SRI. BHADRESH S/O M. GANGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS

2. G RUPESH S/O M GANGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, Digitally signed …PETITIONERS by NAGAVENI Location: HIGH (BY SRI. SHRIRAMA, ADVOCATE) COURT OF KARNATAKA AND:

1. VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, RESIDENT OF GOWDAIAHNAPALAYA,

2. RAMAIAH -2- AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/AT GOWDAIAHNAPALAYA, KARIYANNA S/O LATE MUDALAGIRIYAPPA

3. SMT. LAKSHMAMMA W/O KARIANNA AGED 56 YEARS

4. SRI. KRISHNAMURTHY S/O LATE KARIANNA

5. SMT. GOWRAMMA AGED 51 YEARS

6. SRI. YUVARAJU GOWDA S/O LATE KRISHNAMURTHY AGED 27 YEARS

7. LAKSHMI AGED 24 YEARS

8. SMT. JAYAMMA

9. SHILPA -3-

10. SHILPA AGED 19 YEARS

11. LAKSHMIDEVAMMA AGED 41 YEARS

12. MANGALAMMA AGED 37 YEARS

13. NAGARAHTNAMMA AGED 31 YEARS THE RESPONDENTS 3 TO 13 ALL ARE RESIDING OPPOSITE TO SHANIMATHMA TEMPLE ROAD UPPARAHALLI, TUMAKURU - 572 136.

14. M GANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS HEBBUR HOBLI, TUMAKURU TALUK - 572 120.

15. VENKATARAMANAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YRS -4- …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M.B.CHANDRA CHOODA, ADVOCATE) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER

PASSED BY THE HONBLE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION) AT TUMAKURU IN FDP NO. 04/2014 DATED 03.12.2024 VIDE ANNX-A AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

ORAL ORDER

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has moved the matter seeking to withdraw the petition. In the light of the said submission, the petition is disposed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE JY List No.: 5 Sl No.: 3/CT: BHK

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial