The Managing Director Vs Sarala

The Managing Director vs Sarala

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Apr 30, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1699820

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1699820
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani
Decided On: Apr 30, 2025
Case Number: WP/98/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Managing Director

Respondent

Sarala

Excerpt

.....petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking issuance of writ of certiorari and call for the records and quash the award dated 26.11.2021 passed in i.d(l).no.3 of 2018 by the presiding officer, industrial tribunal cum labour court, puducherry. 2.the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that during the pendancy of the writ petition, the matter was settled between the petitioner and respondents 1 to 3 and the petitioner paid compensation to the respondents 1 to 3. the learned counsel further submitted that now the fourth respondent agreed to receive a sum of rs.7.5 lakhs in full quit as compensation. 3.the learned counsel appearing for the respondents did not dispute the facts submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and on instructions, submitted that the fourth respondent is ready to receive a sum of rs.7.5 lakhs in full quit as compensation. 4.in view of the consent view expressed by the learned counsel appearing on either side, this court directs the petitioner management to pay a sum of rs.7,50,000/- (rupees seven lakhs and fifty thousand only) in full quit to the fourth respondent, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5.the writ petition is disposed of. no costs. consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. pri index: yes/ no speaking order: yes/ no ncc: yes/ no to 1.the presiding officer, industrial tribunal cum labour court, puducherry.m.dhandapani,j.pri and w.m.p.nos.92, 8169, 8172, 8173 and 8174 of 2022

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 30.04.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI And W.M.P.Nos.92, 8169, 8172, 8173 and 8174 of 2022 The Managing Director Rane Madras Limited No.77, Thirubhuvanai Main Road, Thirubhuvanai, Puducherry - 605 107 Rep. by its Authorized Signatory Mr.V.Ramasubramanian ... Petitioner Vs. 1.Sarala 2.Nirmala 3.Vasanthi 4.Kowsalya ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari and call for the records and quash the award dated 26.11.2021 passed in I.D(L).No.3 of 2018 by the Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Puducherry. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Manohar Gupta for M/s.Gupta and Ravi For Respondents : Mr.P.R.Thiruneelakandan

ORDER

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking issuance of Writ of Certiorari and call for the records and quash the award dated 26.11.2021 passed in I.D(L).No.3 of 2018 by the Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Puducherry. 2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that during the pendancy of the writ petition, the matter was settled between the petitioner and respondents 1 to 3 and the petitioner paid compensation to the respondents 1 to 3. The learned counsel further submitted that now the fourth respondent agreed to receive a sum of Rs.7.5 Lakhs in full quit as compensation. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the respondents did not dispute the facts submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and on instructions, submitted that the fourth respondent is ready to receive a sum of Rs.7.5 Lakhs in full quit as compensation. 4.In view of the consent view expressed by the learned counsel appearing on either side, this Court directs the petitioner Management to pay a sum of Rs.7,50,000/- (Rupees Seven Lakhs and Fifty Thousand Only) in full quit to the fourth respondent, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5.The writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. pri Index: Yes/ No Speaking Order: Yes/ No NCC: Yes/ No To 1.The Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Puducherry.

M.DHANDAPANI,J.

pri And W.M.P.Nos.92, 8169, 8172, 8173 and 8174 of 2022

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2025 Same Parties The Managing Director vs Sarala Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani