Krishnaja N vs Vishnu N

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Jul 31, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1697873

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1697873
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: Jayant Banerji
Decided On: Jul 31, 2025
Case Number: WP/13353/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Krishnaja N

Respondent

Vishnu N

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 31st day of july, 2025 before the hon'ble mr. justice jayant banerji writ petition no. 13353 of 2024 (gm-cpc) between:1. krishnaja n w/o veda prakash aged about 37 years r/at no.278, kengeri municipal valagerahalli, 1st block jananabharathi layout bengaluru-560059 …petitioner (by sri. thimme gowda, advocate for sri. ambaji rao najre, advocate) and: digitally signedby k g 1. vishnu. n renukamba s/o narayana.k.g., location: high aged about 35 years,court of karnataka r/at kurubarahalli village kanakapura taluk ramanagara district-562 117 …respondent (by sri. zulfikir kumar shafi., advocate) this wp is filed under article 227 of theconstitution of india praying to quash the orderdtd 06.04.2024 passed on the interim application no.iii filed under order 1 rule 10 of cpc as per annexure-h passed by the learned xii addl.city civil -2- and session judge, bengaluru (cch-27) in os.no.6485/2021. this petition, coming on for preliminary hearing 'b' group, this day, order was made therein as under: coram: hon'ble mr. justice jayant banerjioral ordera memo for withdrawal has been moved today by sri ambaj rao najre, advocate for the petitioner stating that the parties have compromised the dispute and the suit is decreed in terms of the compromise petition and therefore, the petition be dismissed as infructuous.2. this petition is, accordingly, dismissed. sd/- (jayant banerji) judge vm list no.: 1 sl no.: 50

Full Judgment

-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI WRIT PETITION NO. 13353 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
1. KRISHNAJA N W/O VEDA PRAKASH AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS R/AT NO.278, KENGERI MUNICIPAL VALAGERAHALLI, 1ST BLOCK JANANABHARATHI LAYOUT BENGALURU-560059 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. THIMME GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. AMBAJI RAO NAJRE, ADVOCATE) AND: Digitally signed
by K G             1.    VISHNU. N
RENUKAMBA                S/O NARAYANA.K.G.,
Location: HIGH           AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
COURT OF KARNATAKA R/AT KURUBARAHALLI VILLAGE KANAKAPURA TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562 117 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. ZULFIKIR KUMAR SHAFI., ADVOCATE) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER

DTD 06.04.2024 PASSED ON THE INTERIM APPLICATION NO.III FILED UNDER ORDER 1 RULE 10 OF CPC AS PER ANNEXURE-H PASSED BY THE LEARNED XII ADDL.CITY CIVIL -2- AND SESSION JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH-27) IN OS.NO.6485/2021. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI

ORAL ORDER

A memo for withdrawal has been moved today by Sri Ambaj Rao Najre, Advocate for the petitioner stating that the parties have compromised the dispute and the suit is decreed in terms of the compromise petition and therefore, the petition be dismissed as infructuous.

2. This petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Sd/- (JAYANT BANERJI) JUDGE VM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 50

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2025 Same Parties Krishnaja N vs Vishnu N Same Judge Jayant Banerji