Varghese, vs Gireesh,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Apr 07, 2021

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1696779

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1696779
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr. Justice a.Hariprasad,Honourable Mr.Justice Ziyad Rahman a.a.
Decided On: Apr 07, 2021
Case Number: RFA/404/2019

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Varghese,

Respondent

Gireesh,

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice a.hariprasad & the honourable mr.justice ziyad rahman a.a. wednesday, the 07th day of april 2021 / 17th chaithra, 1943 rfa.no.404 of 2019 against the judgment dated 9.7.2019 in os no.171/2018 of principal sub court ,irinjalakuda appellant(plaintiff in the court below): varghese,aged 75,s/o.kaitharan antony, velangangallur desom, vadakkumkara, mukundapuram, thrissur pin 688541. by adv. sri.k.b.pradeep respondent (defendant in the court below):gireesh,aged 50, s/o.alooparambil ramakrishnan, velangangallur desom, vadakkumkara, mukundapuram, thrissur pin 688541. by advs. sri.k.jagadeesh smt.v.renju this regular first appeal having been finally heard on 07.04.2021, the court on the same day delivered the following: rfa no.404 of 2019 2judgmentdated this the 7th day of april 2021hariprasad, j.heard the learned counsel. it is pointed out that the matter has been settled and a compromise petition(i.a.no.1 of 2021) under order xxiii rule 3 read with section 89 of the code of civil procedure, 1908, signed by the parties and their counsel has been filed. it reveals that the parties have settled the matter. i.a. is allowed and the appeal is closed in view of the recitals in the application for recording the compromise.order of attachment, if any continuing, shall stand vacated.all pending interlocutory applications will stand closed. a.hariprasad judge ziyad rahman a.a. cks

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. WEDNESDAY, THE 07TH DAY OF APRIL 2021 / 17TH CHAITHRA, 1943 RFA.No.404 OF 2019 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 9.7.2019 IN OS NO.171/2018 OF PRINCIPAL SUB COURT ,IRINJALAKUDA APPELLANT(PLAINTIFF IN THE COURT BELOW): VARGHESE,AGED 75,S/O.KAITHARAN ANTONY, VELANGANGALLUR DESOM, VADAKKUMKARA, MUKUNDAPURAM, THRISSUR PIN 688541. BY ADV. SRI.K.B.PRADEEP RESPONDENT (DEFENDANT IN THE COURT BELOW):
GIREESH,AGED 50, S/O.ALOOPARAMBIL RAMAKRISHNAN, VELANGANGALLUR DESOM, VADAKKUMKARA, MUKUNDAPURAM, THRISSUR PIN 688541. BY ADVS. SRI.K.JAGADEESH SMT.V.RENJU THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07.04.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: RFA No.404 of 2019 2

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 7th day of April 2021

Hariprasad, J.

Heard the learned counsel. It is pointed out that the matter has been settled and a compromise petition

(I.A.No.1 of 2021) under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 89 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, signed by the parties and their counsel has been filed. It reveals that the parties have settled the matter. I.A. is allowed and the appeal is closed in view of the recitals in the application for recording the compromise.

Order of attachment, if any continuing, shall stand vacated.

All pending interlocutory applications will stand closed. A.HARIPRASAD JUDGE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. cks

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2021 Same Parties Varghese, vs Gireesh, Same Judge Honourable Mr. Justice a.Hariprasad,Honourable Mr.Justice Ziy...