Sri Vijay Kumar @ vs the State of Karnataka

Sri Vijay Kumar @ vs The State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Oct 31, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1696613

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1696613
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: Mohammad Nawaz
Decided On: Oct 31, 2025
Case Number: CRL.P/5531/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sri Vijay Kumar @

Respondent

The State of Karnataka

Excerpt

.....giridhama police station, chadalapura gate, chikkaballapura taluk and district represented by the state public prosecutor, high court of karnataka bengaluru - 560 001.2. smt. anjanadevi wife of r. krishnappa, aged about 73 years, residing at thowdanahalli village, sriramapura post, chikkaballapura taluk and district - 562 101. …respondents(by sri. rahul rai k., hcgp for r1 sri. n. thimmegowda, advocate for r2) this crl.p is filed u/s 482 cr.pc (filed u/s 528 bnss) by the advocate for the petitioner praying to quash the criminal proceedings in fir in cr.no.53/2025 lodged by the second respondent herein pending on the file of the ii addl. civil judge and jmfc at chikkaballapura by the first respondent police initiated for the offences p/u/s. 126(2), 3(5), 329(3), 351(3), 352 of the bnss, registered by nandi giridhama police station and etc. this petition, coming on for admission, this day,order was made therein as under:-3- coram: hon'ble mr. justice mohammad nawazoral orderlearned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo seeking to withdraw the petition reserving liberty to file a fresh petition, in view of filing of charge sheet.2. memo is placed on record.3. with liberty as sought for, petition is dismissed as withdrawn.4. i.a.no.2/2025 is disposed of. sd/- (mohammad nawaz) judge ldc ct-sg list no.: 1 sl no.: 37

Full Judgment

-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 5531 OF 2025 BETWEEN:
1. SRI VIJAY KUMAR @ SRI K VIJAY KUMAR SON OF SRI KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
2. SMT. HEMAVATHI @ SMT. V HEMAVATHI, WIFE OF SRI VIJAY KUMAR AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
3. MASTER V PURUSHOTHAM @ SRI PURUSHOTHAM AGED ABOUT 16 YEARS, Digitally
signed by             SINCE MINOR REPRESENTED BY HIS NATURAL
LAKSHMI T             GUARDIAN AND FATHER SRI K VIJAY KUMAR
Location:             THE 1ST PETITIONER HEREIN
High Court of Karnataka
4. SRI V KIRAN @ SRI KIRAN, AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT THOWDANAHALLI VILLAGE, NANDI HOBLI, CHIKKABALLAPUR TALUK AND DISTRICT - 562 101. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C. SHANKAR REDDY, ADVOCATE) -2- AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
NANDI GIRIDHAMA POLICE STATION, CHADALAPURA GATE, CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK AND DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU - 560 001.
2. SMT. ANJANADEVI WIFE OF R. KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, RESIDING AT THOWDANAHALLI VILLAGE, SRIRAMAPURA POST, CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK AND DISTRICT - 562 101. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. RAHUL RAI K., HCGP FOR R1 SRI. N. THIMMEGOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNSS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO QUASH THE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS IN FIR IN CR.NO.53/2025 LODGED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT HEREIN PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT CHIKKABALLAPURA BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT POLICE INITIATED FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S. 126(2), 3(5), 329(3), 351(3), 352 OF THE BNSS, REGISTERED BY NANDI GIRIDHAMA POLICE STATION AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

-3- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ

ORAL ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo seeking to withdraw the petition reserving liberty to file a fresh petition, in view of filing of charge sheet.

2. Memo is placed on record.

3. With liberty as sought for, petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

4. I.A.No.2/2025 is disposed of. Sd/- (MOHAMMAD NAWAZ) JUDGE LDC CT-SG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 37

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2025 Same Parties Sri Vijay Kumar @ vs The State of Karnataka Same Judge Mohammad Nawaz