Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Niketh Narayanan, vs the Regional Transport Officer,

Niketh Narayanan, vs The Regional Transport Officer,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Oct 29, 2021
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1693874

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/23584/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Niketh Narayanan,

Respondent

The Regional Transport Officer,

Excerpt

.....it is the case of the petitioner that in similar cases, a division bench of this court in w.a. no.220/2018 and connected cases was pleased to hold that the amendment brought in to the kerala motor vehicles taxation act would be effected only from01.10.2017, and hence, the vehicles registered prior to that date would have to discharge tax only on the basis of seating capacity and not on the basis of the floor area.3. i have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned government pleader for the respondent.4. on a consideration of the facts and circumstances ofthe case as also the submissions made across the bar, and taking note of the orders passed in similar cases following the judgment in w.a. no.220/2018 and connected cases, i direct the respondent to effect endorsement of tax in respect of the petitioner's vehicle kl-13/ah-2232 on the basis of seating capacity and not on the basis of floor area. the respondent shall do the needful, to make the consequential endorsement in the rc book within ten days from the date of receipt of a copy of thisjudgment. in that process, if there is any excess amount collected from the petitioner towards tax liability, the same shall be adjusted towards the re- fixed tax liability. sd/- bechu kurian thomas, judge amv/29/10//2021 appendix petitioners exhibits : ext.p1 copy of the relevant portion of the registration certificate of stage carriage no.kl-13/ah-2232 ext.p2 copy of the request dated 20.10.2021 submitted by the petitioner before the respondent. ext.p3 judgment in w.p.(c) no.18598 of 2021 dated 10.09.2021 rendered by this hon'ble court. respondents exhibits : nil true copy

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS FRIDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021 / 7TH KARTHIKA, 1943 PETITIONER: NIKETH NARAYANAN AGED 42 YEARS S/O.P.C.NARAYANAN, SRIRAM NIVAS, KADAMBUR, ETAKKAD, KANNUR. BY ADV O.D.SIVADAS RESPONDENT: THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER (REGISTERING AUTHORITY), OFFICE OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE, CIVIL STATION, KANNUR, PIN - 670 002. DR.THUSHARA JAMES, SR.GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29.10.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J =========================== W.P.(C) No.23584 of 2021 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 29 th day of October, 2021

JUDGMENT

The petitioner is the registered owner of a stage carriage bearing No.KL-13/AH-2232. It was purchased and registered under the Motor Vehicles Act, on 05.09.2016 which is admittedly prior to 01.10.2017.

2. Petitioner is aggrieved by the insistence on the part

of the respondent that motor vehicle tax in respect of the said vehicle should be discharged on the basis of the floor area of the vehicle and not in accordance with the seating capacity. It is the case of the petitioner that in similar cases, a Division Bench of this Court in W.A. No.220/2018 and connected cases was pleased to hold that the amendment brought in to the Kerala Motor Vehicles Taxation Act would be effected only from

01.10.2017, and hence, the vehicles registered prior to that date would have to discharge tax only on the basis of seating capacity and not on the basis of the floor area.

3. I have heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner as also the learned Government Pleader for the respondent.

4. On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of

the case as also the submissions made across the bar, and taking note of the orders passed in similar cases following the judgment in W.A. No.220/2018 and connected cases, I direct the respondent to effect endorsement of tax in respect of the petitioner's vehicle KL-13/AH-2232 on the basis of seating capacity and not on the basis of floor area. The respondent shall do the needful, to make the consequential endorsement in the RC Book within ten days from the date of receipt of a copy of this

judgment. In that process, if there is any excess amount collected from the petitioner towards tax liability, the same shall be adjusted towards the re- fixed tax liability. Sd/- BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, JUDGE AMV/29/10//2021 APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS : EXT.P1 COPY OF THE RELEVANT PORTION OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE OF STAGE CARRIAGE NO.KL-13/AH-2232 EXT.P2 COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 20.10.2021 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT. EXT.P3 JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C) NO.18598 OF 2021 DATED 10.09.2021 RENDERED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT. RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS : NIL TRUE COPY

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial