Sri C Mohan Kumar vs the State of Karnataka

Sri C Mohan Kumar vs The State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Jun 30, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1693763

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1693763
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: E.S.Indiresh
Decided On: Jun 30, 2025
Case Number: WP/11866/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sri C Mohan Kumar

Respondent

The State of Karnataka

Excerpt

.....revenue digitally signed by m.s. building sharma anand chaya dr. ambedkar veedhi location: high bengaluru-560 001 court of karnataka rep. by its secretary.2. the deputy commissioner chikkaballapur district chikkaballpur-562 101.3. the tahsildar chikkaballapur taluk chikkaballapur-562 101. …respondents (by smt. navya shekar, aga) -2- this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to direct the respondents no.2 and 3 to issue necessaryapproval treating the schedule land of the petitioner as converted for residential purpose due to operation of law under section 95(2) of the karnataka land revenue act,1964; and etc. this petition, coming on for preliminary hearing, this day, order was made therein as under: coram: hon'ble mr. justice e.s.indireshoral orderthe learned additional government advocate accepts notice for the respondents.2. heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.3. the petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondent- authorities to grant deemed conversion under section 95(2) of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964. -3-4. the learned additional governmentadvocate, on instructions, submits that respondent no.2 has already rejected the petitioner's application seeking conversion, as per the endorsement dated 24.01.2025.5. in that view of the matter, it is open to thepetitioner to approach the karnataka appellate tribunal for appropriate relief, in accordance with law. reserving such liberty to the petitioner, the writ petition stands disposed of. sd/- (e.s.indiresh) judge sb list no.: 1 sl no.: 30

Full Judgment

-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.11866 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
1. SRI. C. MOHAN KUMAR
S/O SRI CHIKKA MUNIYAPPA T. AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT NNR CITY LAYOUT CHOKKAHALLI VILLAGE AND POST NANDI HOBLI, CHIKKABALLAPUR TALUK CHIKKABALLPUR DISTRICT-562 103. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SOMASHEKARA K.M., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE Digitally signed by M.S. BUILDING SHARMA ANAND CHAYA DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI Location: HIGH BENGALURU-560 001 COURT OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY.
2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT CHIKKABALLPUR-562 101.
3. THE TAHSILDAR CHIKKABALLAPUR TALUK CHIKKABALLAPUR-562 101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKAR, AGA) -2- THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS NO.2 AND 3 TO ISSUE NECESSARY
APPROVAL TREATING THE SCHEDULE LAND OF THE PETITIONER AS CONVERTED FOR RESIDENTIAL PURPOSE DUE TO OPERATION OF LAW UNDER SECTION 95(2) OF THE KARNATAKA LAND REVENUE ACT,1964; AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH

ORAL ORDER

The learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.

3. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondent- authorities to grant deemed conversion under Section 95(2) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964. -3-

4. The learned Additional Government

Advocate, on instructions, submits that respondent No.2 has already rejected the petitioner's application seeking conversion, as per the Endorsement dated 24.01.2025.

5. In that view of the matter, it is open to the

petitioner to approach the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal for appropriate relief, in accordance with law. Reserving such liberty to the petitioner, the writ petition stands disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2025 Same Parties Sri C Mohan Kumar vs The State of Karnataka Same Judge E.S.Indiresh