Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sri Devaraj D M vs State of Karnataka

Sri Devaraj D M vs State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Apr 28, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1693718

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/11833/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sri Devaraj D M

Respondent

State of Karnataka

Excerpt

.....- 562 110. …respondents (by sri. v. shiva reddy., aga) -2- this wp is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india, praying to direction to the 4th respondent for considering the representation as annexure-a, dated 28.03.2025 filed by petitioner in respect of in respect of sy.no.58/1 measuring 1 acres 25 guntas of dyvarahalli village, kundana hobli, devanahalli taluk. this petition, coming on for preliminary hearing in 'b' group, this day, order was made therein as under: coram: hon'ble mr justice n s sanjay gowdaoral order1. the prayer in this writ petition is to direct the 4threspondent to consider the representation dated 28.03.2025 submitted by the petitioner at annexure-a, by which, he is contending that he has purchased the property in question under the registered sale deed and therefore, revenue records be accordingly mutated in his name.2. in light of the fact that the petitioner isrequesting to mutate his name in the revenue record on the basis of the registered sale deed, the tahsildar is directed to consider the aforesaid -3- representation of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.3. the writ petition is accordingly disposed of. sd/- (n s sanjay gowda) judge pks list no.: 1 sl no.: 149

Full Judgment

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 11833 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:

1. SRI DEVARAJ D M S/O MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS R/AT DODDACHEEMANAHALLI VILLAGE KUNDANA HOBLI BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 562110 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. CHOKKAREDDY., ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA

UNDER SECRETARY OF REVENUE DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDING, AMEDHKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE 560 001 Digitally signed by KIRAN 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KUMAR R Location: BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT HIGH BEERASANDRA VILLAGE COURT OF KARNATAKA DEVANAHALLI TALUK 562 110

3. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DODDABALLAPURA SUB-DIVISION DODDABALLAPURA

4. TAHSILDAR

DEVANAHALLI - 562 110. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. V. SHIVA REDDY., AGA) -2- THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECTION TO THE 4TH RESPONDENT FOR CONSIDERING THE REPRESENTATION AS ANNEXURE-A, DATED 28.03.2025 FILED BY PETITIONER IN RESPECT OF IN RESPECT OF SY.NO.58/1 MEASURING 1 ACRES 25 GUNTAS OF DYVARAHALLI VILLAGE, KUNDANA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA

ORAL ORDER

1. The prayer in this writ petition is to direct the 4th

respondent to consider the representation dated 28.03.2025 submitted by the petitioner at Annexure-A, by which, he is contending that he has purchased the property in question under the registered Sale Deed and therefore, revenue records be accordingly mutated in his name.

2. In light of the fact that the petitioner is

requesting to mutate his name in the revenue record on the basis of the registered Sale Deed, the Tahsildar is directed to consider the aforesaid -3- representation of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

3. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. Sd/- (N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE PKS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 149

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial