Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Kala Vs The District Collector

Kala vs The District Collector

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Jan 21, 2026
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1693687

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(MD)/1276/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Kala

Respondent

The District Collector

Excerpt

.....representation dated 17.07.2025 was made seeking survey and demarcation of the boundaries of the said property. since no action has been taken by the respondents 2 and 3, the present writ petition has been filed.4. the learned special government pleader appearing for the respondents 1to 3 submits that after issuing notice to the adjacent land owners, appropriate steps would be taken to survey and demarcate the land in accordance with sections 9 and 10 of the tamil nadu survey and boundaries act, 1923.5. recording the aforesaid submission, this writ petition stands disposed ofwith a direction to the respondents to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 17.07.2025 for survey and demarcation on merits and in accordance with law. notice shall be issued to the petitioner and the owners of adjacent lands and appropriate orders shall be passed in accordance with sections 9 and 10 of the tamil nadu survey and boundaries act 1923, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. needless to statethat in the event of any rival claims, the same can be agitated before the competent civil court. no costs. ncc : yes / no (k.surender, j.) index : yes / no 21.01.2026 smn2 to:- 1.the district collector, madurai, 2.the tahsildar, 3.the head surveyor, 4.the inspector of police, elumalai police station,k.surender, j.smn2 21.01.2026

Full Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.01.2026

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDER

Kala ... Petitioner -vs- 1.The District Collector, Madurai, 2.The Tahsildar, 3.The Head Surveyor, 4.The Inspector of Police, Elumalai Police Station, Madurai District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 2 and 3 to survey and demarcate the petitioner's landed properties in Survey No.33/1, extent 0.87.50 Ares and the property situated at Thadaiyampatti Village, Setapatti Union,

Peraiyur Taluk, Madurai District, on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 17.07.2025 after giving necessary opportunity to the parties concerned within time frame as fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ramachandra Pradeep For R1 to R3 : Mr.P.Subbaraj Special Government Pleader For R4 : Mr.S.Prakash Government Advocate (Criminal side)

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 2 and 3 to survey and demarcate the petitioner’s landed property in Survey No.33/1, measuring an extent of 0.87.50 Ares, situated at Thadaiyampatti Village, Setapatti Union, Peraiyur Taluk, Madurai District, on the basis of the petitioner’s representation dated 17.07.2025, after affording necessary opportunity to the parties concerned, within the time frame to be fixed by this Court.

2. By consent, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the

petitioner is the absolute owner of the property in question and that a representation dated 17.07.2025 was made seeking survey and demarcation of the boundaries of the said property. Since no action has been taken by the respondents 2 and 3, the present writ petition has been filed.

4. The learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1

to 3 submits that after issuing notice to the adjacent land owners, appropriate steps would be taken to survey and demarcate the land in accordance with Sections 9 and 10 of the Tamil Nadu Survey and Boundaries Act, 1923.

5. Recording the aforesaid submission, this writ petition stands disposed of

with a direction to the respondents to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 17.07.2025 for survey and demarcation on merits and in accordance with law. Notice shall be issued to the petitioner and the owners of adjacent lands and appropriate orders shall be passed in accordance with Sections 9 and 10 of the Tamil Nadu Survey and Boundaries Act 1923, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Needless to state

that in the event of any rival claims, the same can be agitated before the competent civil court. No costs. NCC : Yes / No (K.SURENDER, J.) Index : Yes / No 21.01.2026 smn2 To:- 1.The District Collector, Madurai, 2.The Tahsildar, 3.The Head Surveyor, 4.The Inspector of Police, Elumalai Police Station,

K.SURENDER, J.

smn2 21.01.2026

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial