Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Joy vs State of Kerala

JOY vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Feb 25, 2021
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1693589

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/16285/2013

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

JOY

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice raja vijayaraghavan v thursday, the 25th day of february 2021 / 6th phalguna, 1942 wp(c).no.16285 of 2013(i) petitioner : joy, s/o thomas, vazhappilly veetil, chettupuzha desom, pullazhi village, thrissur district. by adv. sri.r.satish kumar respondents :1 state of kerala, represented by the secretary, revenue department, governmenty secretariat, thiruvananthapuram 695001. 2 the district collector, idukki district-685584. 3 the special tahsildar (la), 4 the revenue divisional officer (rdo), 5 the additional tahsildar, devikulam, idukki district 685613. 6 the village officer anaviratty village, idukki district 685561. 7 the commissioner of land revenue, thiruvananthapuram 695001. smt. sheeja c.s., senior government pleaderthis writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 25.02.2021, the court on the same day delivered the following: wp(c).no.16285 of 2013 2judgmentin view of the memo filed by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. sd/- raja vijayaraghavan v judge dsv

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V THURSDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 6TH PHALGUNA, 1942 WP(C).No.16285 OF 2013(I) PETITIONER : JOY, S/O THOMAS, VAZHAPPILLY VEETIL, CHETTUPUZHA DESOM, PULLAZHI VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.R.SATISH KUMAR RESPONDENTS :

1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENTY SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695001. 2 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, IDUKKI DISTRICT-685584. 3 THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LA), 4 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER (RDO), 5 THE ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR, DEVIKULAM, IDUKKI DISTRICT 685613. 6 THE VILLAGE OFFICER ANAVIRATTY VILLAGE, IDUKKI DISTRICT 685561. 7 THE COMMISSIONER OF LAND REVENUE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695001. SMT. SHEEJA C.S., SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No.16285 OF 2013 2

JUDGMENT

In view of the memo filed by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V JUDGE DSV

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial